2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2841079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity of the Arrhenius equation for electron attachment rate coefficients

Abstract: The validity of the Arrhenius equation for dissociative electron attachment rate coefficients is investigated. A general analysis allows us to obtain estimates of the upper temperature bound for the range of validity of the Arrhenius equation in the endothermic case and both lower and upper bounds in the exothermic case with a reaction barrier. The results of the general discussion are illustrated by numerical examples whereby the rate coefficient, as a function of temperature for dissociative electron attachm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 over the electron energy distribution. The results do not show a significant temperature dependence because the low-energy behavior of the cross section is close to E −1/2 meaning that the rate coefficient weakly depends on E. The growth of the ClF rate coefficient with temperature is slow and does not indicate any activation energy typical for Arrheniustype behavior [44]. In Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparison With Theorymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…5 over the electron energy distribution. The results do not show a significant temperature dependence because the low-energy behavior of the cross section is close to E −1/2 meaning that the rate coefficient weakly depends on E. The growth of the ClF rate coefficient with temperature is slow and does not indicate any activation energy typical for Arrheniustype behavior [44]. In Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparison With Theorymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Ruckhaberle et al 39 supported their low activation energy with density functional calculations on the change in NF 3 potential energy for N-F stretching motion, which yielded an activation energy of 0.2 eV, believed an overestimate. Aside from a question of whether such a calculation is accurate enough to choose between the rival experimental activation energies, there are more important issues noted by Fabrikant and Hotop 44 in a recent study of Arrhenius-like behavior in electron attachment. Fabrikant and Hotop 44 found that the activation energy determined from thermal attachment depended on whether the reaction was endothermic or exothermic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The modeling suggests a larger barrier than does an Arrhenius fit; interestingly, application of Rmatrix theory to other exothermic dissociative electron attachments also suggests that Arrhenius underestimates the barrier height in such systems. 48 The near flat temperature dependence of the rate constant over the measured range is the result of the positive dependence on the C 2 F 5 internal energy distribution being offset by the negative dependence on the electron temperature. At lower temperatures, the former will dominate, and Arrhenius fit behaviour is predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 The C 2 F 5 data may be fitted to an Arrhenius equation assuming a small activation energy of 90 cm −1 ; corresponding to an energetic barrier between the neutral and anion potential energy surfaces where some amount of vibrational excitation is needed to surmount the barrier. The Arrhenius description tends to fail at higher energies and offers limited physical insight into the magnitude of the rate constants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%