2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity of the first-order approach with moral hazard and hidden assets

Abstract: With moral hazard and anonymous asset trade, first-order conditions need not characterize effort and portfolio choices. A common procedure for establishing validity of the first-order approach in economies with one hidden asset is not fruitful when multiple assets are hidden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jewitt [5] provided some conditions which can be used for justifying the first-order approach in the multi-statistic case. For more literature about the first-order approach for solving principal-agent problems see, e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and the references therein.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jewitt [5] provided some conditions which can be used for justifying the first-order approach in the multi-statistic case. For more literature about the first-order approach for solving principal-agent problems see, e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and the references therein.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sufficient conditions we derive are for a one‐period economy with two possible realizations of uncertainty. Establishing validity of the first‐order approach in economies with multiple states and hidden assets is harder, as shown in Bertola and Koeniger (). It might be possible to do so with different methods, perhaps adapting to problems with hidden assets, the direct approach of Jewitt () rather than that of Rogerson ().…”
Section: Validity Of the First‐order Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%