2004
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-10298-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity of two-dimensional numerical approaches to time-dependent thermal convection

Abstract: High-resolution computer simulations of two-dimensional (2D) convection are often used to investigate turbulent flows. In this paper we compare numerical simulations in 2D with three-dimensional (3D) simulations. We investigate flows at a fixed Rayleigh number of Ra = 10 6 . The velocity boundary conditions are rigid for the upper and lower boundary and stress-free for the side walls. For high values of the Prandtl number the flow structure and global quantities such as the Nusselt number (Nu) and the Reynolds… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
96
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we ran a series of tests to compare both the qualitative behavior and the quantitative estimates of the fluxes (and other system diagnostics) in 2D and 3D. Simulations in 2D and 3D often lead to very different types of dynamics, especially at low Pr (Schmalzl et al 2004;van der Poel et al 2013;Garaud & Brummell 2015). Fortunately, however, as we see from is very similar to that of the 3D simulation analyzed in the previous section.…”
Section: D Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For this reason, we ran a series of tests to compare both the qualitative behavior and the quantitative estimates of the fluxes (and other system diagnostics) in 2D and 3D. Simulations in 2D and 3D often lead to very different types of dynamics, especially at low Pr (Schmalzl et al 2004;van der Poel et al 2013;Garaud & Brummell 2015). Fortunately, however, as we see from is very similar to that of the 3D simulation analyzed in the previous section.…”
Section: D Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Good consistency between 2D and 3D runs have also been found for thermal convection when Pr . 1 (Schmalzl et al 2004). Whether this condition also applies to diffusive convection is, however, not known.…”
Section: Heat Flux Scaling a Results From Dnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional simulations are used to aid visualization and identification of plume emission locations. Even though two-dimensional (2D) RB differs from three-dimensional (3D) RB in terms of integral quantities for finite Pr [24,32], the theoretical arguments for logarithmic profiles are not specific to 3D RB. Furthermore, the two-dimensional domain is more suitable to study the horizontal dependence of the boundary layer profile than the three-dimensional domain.…”
Section: Impactingmentioning
confidence: 99%