The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc. A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated.
