2018
DOI: 10.1080/2150704x.2018.1453174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the vertical accuracy of the ALOS world 3D-30m digital elevation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Takaku et al [61] found slope-dependent errors, with errors greater than 5 m occurring for slope angles larger than 30 degrees. Using longitudinal profiles of airport runways, Caglar et al [62] found that AW3D30 has an RMSE of 1.78 m and contains an elevation anomaly due to sensor noise and the processing algorithm. Takaku et al [61] found a mostly positive bias, while Caglar et al [62] identified a negative bias in elevation estimation.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Takaku et al [61] found slope-dependent errors, with errors greater than 5 m occurring for slope angles larger than 30 degrees. Using longitudinal profiles of airport runways, Caglar et al [62] found that AW3D30 has an RMSE of 1.78 m and contains an elevation anomaly due to sensor noise and the processing algorithm. Takaku et al [61] found a mostly positive bias, while Caglar et al [62] identified a negative bias in elevation estimation.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using longitudinal profiles of airport runways, Caglar et al [62] found that AW3D30 has an RMSE of 1.78 m and contains an elevation anomaly due to sensor noise and the processing algorithm. Takaku et al [61] found a mostly positive bias, while Caglar et al [62] identified a negative bias in elevation estimation. In the Philippines, AW3D30's RMSE varies from 4.3 m in urban areas to 6.8 m in areas with dense vegetation [32].…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing Table 3, one may conclude the following: (1) The bias in the case of photogrammetryderived models (ASTER and AW3D30) is positive and reaches approximately 2 m. The bias for the X-Band InSAR-derived DEMs (SRTM-X, TanDEM, and WorldDEM TM ) is negative of the order of -1 m. Simultaneously, the elevation bias of the C-Band InSAR-derived DEM (SRTM-1"/3") is the lowest and of the order of 0.6 m. The global DEMs' bias issue was noted in the previous literature [2,19] and is believed to be due to the calibration of the SAR data (performed over the ocean), the accuracy of the ground control points (GCPs), and/or the accuracy of the geoid. This bias could be locally eliminated by estimating it using a few checkpoints with known elevations from an independent survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The testbed used in this study was a runway (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) at Zonguldak Airport, located 8 km to the north of Çaycuma, Turkey (Lat = 41 Some of the runway's relevant physical parameters are listed in Table 1. The runway was constructed in the 1960s.…”
Section: Area Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study area, we have two freely available DEMs, the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission DEM (SRTM) of 30 meters resolution and the ALOS-PALSAR DEM of 12.5 meters resolution per pixel. Alganci et al (2018) and 275 Caglar et al, (2018) compare these two DEM and others global procucts concluding that ALOS-PALSAR has lower errors. Therefore, we used it for numerical simulation.…”
Section: Tographymentioning
confidence: 96%