“…Unfortunately, the form reported by Bradshaw and Andrews for ∆W , as seen above, is incorrect and their neglect of electric-quadrupole contributions cannot be justified. Consequently, the results seen in equations ( 10), ( 13), ( 15), ( 16), ( 17), ( 18) and ( 19) of [12]; (4), ( 5), ( 7) and ( 8) of [13]; (10), ( 11), ( 12), ( 13), ( 17), ( 19) and ( 21) of [14] and ( 1) and ( 2) of [16] are in error, as they are not uniquely defined: their forms change with changes in the location chosen for the origin of the molecular multipole expansion. An energy shift and associated force cannot take values that depend on the manner in which we choose to calculate them.…”