2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00023-017-0570-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Virtual Levels of Positively Projected Massless Coulomb–Dirac Operators

Abstract: Considering different self-adjoint realisations of positively projected massless Coulomb-Dirac operators we find out, under which conditions any negative perturbation, however small, leads to emergence of negative spectrum. We also prove some weighted Lieb-Thirring estimates for negative eigenvalues of such operators. In the process we find explicit spectral representations for all self-adjoint realisations of massless Coulomb-Dirac operators on the half-line.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 4 is a form of Lieb-Thirring inequality, (see [20] for the original result and [16] for a review of further developments). In another publication [21] we prove that D 1/2 (0, V ) has a negative eigenvalue for any non-trivial V 0. This situation is associated with the existence of a virtual level at zero, as observed for example for the operator − d 2 dr 2 − 1 4r 2 in L 2 (R + ) (see [9], Proposition 3.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Theorem 4 is a form of Lieb-Thirring inequality, (see [20] for the original result and [16] for a review of further developments). In another publication [21] we prove that D 1/2 (0, V ) has a negative eigenvalue for any non-trivial V 0. This situation is associated with the existence of a virtual level at zero, as observed for example for the operator − d 2 dr 2 − 1 4r 2 in L 2 (R + ) (see [9], Proposition 3.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The proof is analogous to the one of Part I of Theorem 2.5 in [13]. Let j ∈ {−1, 1} 2 be such that the conditions (1.11) and (1.12) are satisfied.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 17mentioning
confidence: 87%