1965
DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.15.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the “Water Response” of Frog's Tongue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

1973
1973
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic test solutions used were deionized water, 1 M sodium chloride, 7 mM quinine hydrochloride and 3.5 mM hydrochloric acid, the latter two being dissolved in Ringer's solution. In our experiments on cats, in contrast with those on frogs (NOMURA and SAKATA, 1965), the deionized water evoked the same number of impulses in water-sensitive fibers as evoked by tap water which contained about 1 mM Ca++. Other test solutions employed were varying concentrations of mono-and divalent chloride salts, whose cation portion was Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+, Ca+ +, Mg+ + , Sr+ +, and, in some cases, Ba+ +.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Basic test solutions used were deionized water, 1 M sodium chloride, 7 mM quinine hydrochloride and 3.5 mM hydrochloric acid, the latter two being dissolved in Ringer's solution. In our experiments on cats, in contrast with those on frogs (NOMURA and SAKATA, 1965), the deionized water evoked the same number of impulses in water-sensitive fibers as evoked by tap water which contained about 1 mM Ca++. Other test solutions employed were varying concentrations of mono-and divalent chloride salts, whose cation portion was Li+, Na+, K+, NH4+, Ca+ +, Mg+ + , Sr+ +, and, in some cases, Ba+ +.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Since then, the water response of the frog tongue has been extensively studied (Zotterman. 1949a, b; Anderson & Zotterman, 1950;Koketsu, 1951;Koketsu & Kimura, 1953;Kusano & M. Sato, 1957;Nomura H. ARITO, M. IINO AND S. F. TAKAGI & Sakada, 1965;T. Sato & Beidler, 1973, 1975Akaike, Noma & M. Sato, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory effect of Na+ on the Ca2+ response The Ca2+ response was inhibited by Na salts (CASELLA and RAPUZZI, 1957;YAMASHITA, 1963;NOMURA and SAKADA, 1965;JUNGE and BRODWICK, 1970). In the present study the effect of Na+ was examined under a condition in which anions did not inhibit the Ca2+ response.…”
Section: Influences Of So24-and CL -On Ca2+ Responsementioning
confidence: 87%
“…It has been reported by some investigators that water fibers of the frog tongue (ZOTTERMAN, 1949) responds well to Ca2+ in very low concentration, and the Ca2+ response is inhibited by NaCl or KCl (CASELLA and RAPUZZI, 1957;NOMURA and SAKADA, 1965;JUNGE and BRODWICK, 1970). They showed that the inhibitory effects of the salts are due to cations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%