2011
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2011-05124-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Weil-étale cohomology of number fields

Abstract: Abstract. We give a direct description of the category of sheaves on Lichtenbaum's Weil-étale site of a number ring. Then we apply this result to define a spectral sequence relating Weil-étale cohomology to Artin-Verdierétale cohomology. Finally we construct complexes ofétale sheaves computing the expected Weil-étale cohomology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where RZ is the complex defined in [38] Theorem 8.5 and R W Z := RZ ≤2 . The complex RΓ(X W , Z), defined in [35], is the cohomology of the Weil-étale topos X W which is defined in [39].…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where RZ is the complex defined in [38] Theorem 8.5 and R W Z := RZ ≤2 . The complex RΓ(X W , Z), defined in [35], is the cohomology of the Weil-étale topos X W which is defined in [39].…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist complexes R W (ϕ ! Z) and R W (Z) of sheaves on the Artin-Verdier étale topos whose hypercohomology is the conjectural Lichtenbaum cohomology with and without compact support respectively (see [15]). This suggests the existence of a canonical morphism of topoi…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for any v not in U . For an ultrametric place v, the morphism [15] Prop. 6.2) and by a geometric point of X over v. If v is archimedean, G k(v) = {1} and u v : Sets → Xet is the point of the étale topos corresponding to v ∈ X.…”
Section: The Fundamental Group and Unramified Class Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in [11], the Weil-étale cohomology introduced in [8] is not defined as the cohomology of a Grothendieck site (i.e. of a topos).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group is the Galois group of the maximal sub-extension ofF /K unramified at any place of K corresponding to ofŪ (regardless if such a place is ultrametric or archimedean). More geometrically, we consider the filtered set of pointed Galois étale cover {(V , qV ) → (Ū , qŪ )} to define the étale fundamental groupπ 1 (Ū et , qŪ ) := lim ←− (V ,qV ) Gal(V /Ū )The pair(11) (π 1 (Ū et , qŪ ), lim −→ (V ,qV ) CV ) is a (topological) class formation (see[14] Proposition 8.3.8 and [14] Theorem 8.3.12). This follows from the fact that if L/K is a Galois extension unramified overŪ , then the G L/K -module w∈V O × Lw in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%