2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the welfare and cyclical implications of moderate trend inflation

Abstract: We acknowledge Yuriy Gorodnichenko and Juan Rubio-Ramirez for helpful comments and suggestions at an early stage of this project, Sylvain Leduc for useful comments on the current draft and Jean-Gardy Victor for capable research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ascari et al (2015) study optimal inflation in a model with nominal rigidities. As we do, they include wage rigidity, but do not incorporate the ZLB.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascari et al (2015) study optimal inflation in a model with nominal rigidities. As we do, they include wage rigidity, but do not incorporate the ZLB.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing inflation costs in the 0-2% and 2-4% inflation bands allows us to show that raising trend inflation by 2% is more costly from 2% to 4% than from 0% to 2%. Therefore, as Ascari, Phaneuf, and Sims (2018) emphasize, the FED should be cautious when it considers increasing the inflation target by some moderate amount from 2% to 3% or 4%. With the 0-7% inflation band, we can assess how a high level of inflation affects wage dispersion relative to price dispersion.…”
Section: Inflation Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Ascari, Phaneuf, and Sims (2018), our model also accounts for positive trend inflation and real per capita output growth. Despite some similarities, there are three main differences between our approach and theirs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erceg et al (2000) employ the model with both price and wage stickiness to show that variability of growth rates of nominal wages implies misalignment of wages, thus an inefficient utilization of labours. The inefficient utilization of labour then is magnified by constant positive trend inflation Ascari et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%