1982
DOI: 10.1002/net.3230120103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the worst‐case performance of some algorithms for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem

Abstract: We consider the asymmetric traveling salesman problem for which the triangular inequality is satisfied. For various heuristics we construct examples to show that the worst-case ratio of length of tour found to minimum length tour is ~2 (n) for n city problems. We also provide a new 0 ([log2 nl ) heuristic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
162
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since pref(s i ; s j ) jsj, we can conclude that opt(TSP) opt(S), where opt(TSP) is the optimal solution to TSP de ned above. This TSP is directed (sometimes called asymmetric); thus the best known approximation [9] is only within a factor of O(log n). Therefore, we must exploit more of the structure of the problem in order to achieve better bounds.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pref(s i ; s j ) jsj, we can conclude that opt(TSP) opt(S), where opt(TSP) is the optimal solution to TSP de ned above. This TSP is directed (sometimes called asymmetric); thus the best known approximation [9] is only within a factor of O(log n). Therefore, we must exploit more of the structure of the problem in order to achieve better bounds.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frieze, Galbiati and Maffioli [7] designed an approximation algorithm for ATSP with approximation ratio O(log n). Blaser [3] notes that the approximation ratio proved in [7] is precisely log 2 n (with leading constant 1), and then designs an algorithm for which he shows an approximation ratio of 0.999 log 2 n. Subsequently, Kaplan et al [10] designed an algorithm with approximation ratio 4/3 log 3 n 0.842 log 2 n (using a technique that they apply to other related problems as well).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blaser [3] notes that the approximation ratio proved in [7] is precisely log 2 n (with leading constant 1), and then designs an algorithm for which he shows an approximation ratio of 0.999 log 2 n. Subsequently, Kaplan et al [10] designed an algorithm with approximation ratio 4/3 log 3 n 0.842 log 2 n (using a technique that they apply to other related problems as well). In this paper, we provide a modest improvement in the leading constant of the approximation ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses different principles of soccer to solve combinatorial optimization problems. The quality of this technique is demonstrated applying it to four combinatorial problems [23]: Asymmetric traveling salesman problem (ATSP) [24], Vehicle Routing Problem with Backhauls (VRPB) [25], [26], n-Queen Problem (NQP) [27], One-Dimensional Bin Packing Problem (BPP) [28].This algorithm is a promising metaheuristic to solve combinatorial optimization problems [23].…”
Section: A Golden Ball Metaheuristicmentioning
confidence: 99%