2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of LiNixMnyCozO2 material and electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was recently demonstrated by Wood et al [27], with an impressive comparison of data from various publications. However, for a large variety of cathode materials, as well as for anode materials, the BE referencing and careful peak fitting plays an important role [31,40,41]. In a detailed review [42], possible uncertainties using the C1s BE reference of adventitious carbon have been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was recently demonstrated by Wood et al [27], with an impressive comparison of data from various publications. However, for a large variety of cathode materials, as well as for anode materials, the BE referencing and careful peak fitting plays an important role [31,40,41]. In a detailed review [42], possible uncertainties using the C1s BE reference of adventitious carbon have been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of Ni 2p 3/2 and Ni 2p 1/2 peaks is further split into two peaks (centered at 853.8 and 856.5 eV for Ni 2p 3/2 ; 871 and 874.5 eV for Ni 2p 1/2 ) due to non‐local screening of the core hole by charge transfer from the non‐nearest ligands. [ 37,38 ] Interestingly, a clear distinction between the sulfides formed above 400 °C can be observed in terms of area under the curve for different peaks as shown in Table S3, Supporting Information. Clearly, the sulfides formed above 400 °C show a much‐reduced area under the peak for the satellite peak in comparison to the NIS‐300 and NIS‐400 samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in an interesting study, Bondarchuk et al estimated the Ni 3+ : Ni 2+ component from the ratio of the main peak to the satellite peak (Ni 2p 3/2 : satellite1), based on the fact that the Ni 3+ , with d 7 electrons, has a low spin configuration which does not allow multiplet splitting, thus not contributing to satellite at all. [ 37 ] The overall contribution to the satellite peak is due to the Ni 2+ species in the system, and the ratio of Ni 2p 3/2 : satellite1 can be used for the relative estimation of Ni 3+ : Ni 2+ in a set of systems. For this purpose, Ni 2p 3/2 : satellite1 for all the Ni‐based sulfides were calculated by taking the area ratio of the deconvoluted peaks (Table S3, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak peaks at 854.0 and 872.1 eV were ascribed to the presence of Ni 2+ while the strong peaks at 855.6 and 873.7 eV indicated the appearance of Ni 3+ . 25,26 The relative content of Ni 2+ in the total Ni on the catalyst surface was 8.9%. The O 1s XPS spectrum in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%