1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02673905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the τ-calculus of generators forC 0-semigroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper is devoted to some generalizations and analogs of Yosida's Theorem in terms of so-called Bochner-Phillips calculus [1,14] (see also [5,Chap. XIII]; [8,15,11,2]). Though the majority of works on Bochner-Phillips calculus use the class B of (positive) Bernstein functions, we prefer the class T of negative one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present paper is devoted to some generalizations and analogs of Yosida's Theorem in terms of so-called Bochner-Phillips calculus [1,14] (see also [5,Chap. XIII]; [8,15,11,2]). Though the majority of works on Bochner-Phillips calculus use the class B of (positive) Bernstein functions, we prefer the class T of negative one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closure of this operator, which is also denoted by ψ(A), is a generator of a bounded C 0semigroup g t (A) on X (the "subordinate semigroup"), too. (For the multidimensional version of this calculus see, e.g., [9], [10], [11]. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the choice of θ ∈ (0, θ) is arbitrary, the corollary follows. 2 Unfortunately, the proof of this fact in [21] seems to contain a mistake. Specifically, in the notation of [21], the proof at its final stage relies on the boundedness of the operator ψ(A)g t (A) which was not proved in [21].…”
Section: Main Results: Holomorphy and Preservation Of Anglesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2 Unfortunately, the proof of this fact in [21] seems to contain a mistake. Specifically, in the notation of [21], the proof at its final stage relies on the boundedness of the operator ψ(A)g t (A) which was not proved in [21]. Nonetheless, the holomorphy of (e −tψ(A) ) t≥0 was proved in [24,Theorem 13] for uniformly convex X by means of the Kato-Pazy criterion.…”
Section: Main Results: Holomorphy and Preservation Of Anglesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…8, §2] and also [8][9][10]) and natural applications related to solvability issues for the Cauchy problem for abstract first-order differential equations unsolved for the derivative. (See [11] and references therein.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%