On Three-Valued Acceptance Conditions of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Alcântara, João; Sá, Samy

doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2019.07.002

Cited by 3 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Proposition 5, we show that the concepts of semi-stable and semitwo-valued semantics coincide in the associated ADF of a given AF, intuitively, since in AFs there cannot be a support cycle. Alcântara and Sá (2018) have also considered the semistable semantics for ADFs. To prevent confusion with the notion of semi-stable semantics presented in the current work, we call their notion semi-stable2 semantics, abbreviated SSS2.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In particular, in their discussion, the characteristic operator Γ D and in addition, the semantics of ADFs, and specifically the complete semantics, have not been presented in the way as introduced by Brewka and Woltran (2018;. For instance, by their deviating definition of complete labelling (Alcântara and Sá 2018), only {¬a, ¬b} is a complete labelling/grounded model of D = ({a, b}, {ϕ a : b, ϕ b : a}). Hence-unlike the standard definitions-the set of preferred labellings of D is in their approach not a subset of the set of complete labellings of D, and the unique grounded labelling {} is not a complete labelling.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Section 5, we present the conclusion of our work. Furthermore, we briefly discuss a related research, in particular, (Alcântara and Sá 2018) has also proposed a notion of semi-stable semantics for ADFs.…”

Section: Requirements Of Semi-stable Semanticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Semi-Stable Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Zafarghandi

Verbrugge

Verheij

2021

Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation allowing general logical satisfaction conditions. Different criteria that have been used to settle the acceptance of arguments are called semantics. However, the notion of semi-stable semantics as studied for abstract argumentation frameworks has received little attention for ADFs. In the current work, we present the concepts of semi-two-valued models and semi-stable models for ADFs. We show that these two notions satisfy a set of plausible properties required for semi-stable semantics of ADFs. Moreover, we show that semi-two-valued and semi-stable semantics of ADFs form a proper generalization of the semi-stable semantics of AFs, just like two-valued model and stable semantics for ADFs are generalizations of stable semantics for AFs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Semi-Stable Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Zafarghandi

Verbrugge

Verheij

2021

Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• ADFs are expressive enough to model non-monotonic knowledge representation languages, as investigated in (Alcântara and Sá, 2018;Heyninck et al, 2020).…”

Section: Abstract Dialectical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Section 5.4, we present the conclusion of our work. Furthermore, we briefly discuss a related research, in particular, (Alcântara and Sá, 2018) has also proposed a notion of semi-stable semantics for ADFs.…”

Section: Requirements Of Semi-stable Semanticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Zafarghandi¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to both my supervisors Bart Verheij and Rineke Verbrugge. Their knowledge and experience led to the significant improvement of my dissertation. They have always been motivating for pursuing my ideas and even when my drafts needed an enormous change, my supervisors had a positive point of view about my achievements. Further, I have always been appreciative for the freedom with which they guided me and for being open to all sorts of different approaches that did not always fit into our initial plans. I also want to thank them for their full support concerning my life over these years. Their kindness and advice helped me not to feel pressured or stressed during the project, especially in the tough times of the corona pandemic. I had the chance to freely share my feelings with them whenever I felt less motivated. In such conditions, by reminding of the priority of each person's life and health, they significantly helped me to go back to the main route of my work.I would like to extend my sincere thanks to professors Gerhard Brewka, Pietro Baroni, and Helle Hansen, who kindly accepted to participate in the reading committee of this thesis. Their valuable comments led to the better development of the results. I am especially grateful to Helle Hansen for all her attention to this dissertation. I believe that it is almost impossible that even a tiny mistake would go unnoticed under her radar. I also like to thank professor Stefan Woltran, my master's degree supervisor, who recommended me to apply for this PhD program. He never stops supporting me with his valuable advice.The financial support for this research was provided by the Center of Data Science & Systems Complexity (DSSC) Doctoral Programme, at the University of Groningen which provides an excellent opportunity in a very friendly research environment.I have to thank all my colleagues, who have supported me: Martin

show abstract

Capítulo 1: Los métodos en la investigación en educación: un análisis de la epistemología

Lozano Rivera,

García Ramírez,

Jurado Fernández

2024

Epistemología Y Métodos De La Investigación en Educación

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autores consideran que la gnoseología se ocupa del estudio general del conocimiento y el pensamiento, abarcando tanto la ciencia como otros tipos de conocimiento, mientras que la epistemología se centra específicamente en el estudio del conocimiento científico y los métodos utilizados en ciencia. A lo largo de la historia, la ciencia ha sido concebida como el estudio que busca comprender diversos aspectos de la existencia humana, la materia y otros fenómenos a través de investigaciones basadas en hipótesis y teorías. Se apoya en la observación y experimentación para obtener conocimiento. En tal sentido en este capítulo se aborda la perspectiva histórica, así como, las tareas de epistemología como un quehacer conceptual que permite pensar la ciencia. El tercero propone un modelo de investigación basado en la ciencia viva y actuante. El cuarto aborda el método científico y fases de la investigación.

show abstract

On Three-Valued Acceptance Conditions of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Cited by 3 publications

References 16 publications

Semi-Stable Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Semi-Stable Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Capítulo 1: Los métodos en la investigación en educación: un análisis de la epistemología

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About