2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0191-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On time-domain uncoupled analyses for offshore wind turbines under seismic loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Santangelo et al [38] compared the structural responses of coupled and uncoupled time-domain simulations for an offshore wind turbine under earthquake loadings. Kim et al [39] investigated the seismic fragility of a monopile offshore wind turbine by considering the SSI effect.…”
Section: Appropriate Accurate Reliablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santangelo et al [38] compared the structural responses of coupled and uncoupled time-domain simulations for an offshore wind turbine under earthquake loadings. Kim et al [39] investigated the seismic fragility of a monopile offshore wind turbine by considering the SSI effect.…”
Section: Appropriate Accurate Reliablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In performing the analysis of dynamic responses of wind turbines subjected to wind loads and further excited by ground motion corresponding to the earthquake, a seismic module was added in GH Bladed [6]. With the use of GH Bladed, Santangelo et al [25][26] conducted a set of time-domain simulations for the wind turbine under multiple loadings. The differences between the results of fullycoupled and uncoupled time-domain simulations were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the influence of earthquake forces in the SS direction, one of the two horizontal components of earthquakes which will cause larger a tower-base bending moment is selected as the input ground motion and applied along the FA direction of the wind turbine. The studies conducted by Santangelo et al [31][32][33] indicated that the error between the coupled and uncoupled methods was related to earthquakes. Consequently, a set of earthquakes shown in Table 3 are selected from the database of Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research center (PEER) to evaluate the uncoupled model thoroughly, where the far field and near field records recommended by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [42] are included.…”
Section: Earthquake Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was initially used to evaluate the seismic fragility of the NREL 5 MW wind turbine for different mean wind speeds. Immediately, this method was implemented in the GH BLADED software and assessed by comparisons between the coupled and uncoupled analysis results [31][32][33]. Besides, the uncoupled analysis was also performed in ABAQUS where aerodynamic loading was computed by the BEM theory and the average pitch angle was used to consider the effect of pitch regulation [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%