1975
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/8/16/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Timoshenko's correction for shear in vibrating beams

Abstract: The note is a review of studies of the shear coefficient K occurring in Timoshenko's differential equation for flexural vibrations of beams. Expressions of K hitherto proposed for circular and rectangular cross sections are tabulated, together with new expressions hitherto overlooked and unknown, and compared with one another. It is pointed out that the expressions of K=(6+12 sigma +6 sigma 2)/(7+12 sigma +4 sigma 2) for the circle and K=(5+5 sigma )/(6+5 sigma ) for the rectangle, where sigma is Poisson's rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the TBT with KP =5/6 (e.g. Kaneko, 1975;Timoshenko, 1922Timoshenko, , 1921Murthy, 1981;Reissner, 1975;Shi, 2007Shi, , 2011) is in essential equivalent to the third-order model (i.e. Model-A) because of Eq.…”
Section: Shear Correction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the TBT with KP =5/6 (e.g. Kaneko, 1975;Timoshenko, 1922Timoshenko, , 1921Murthy, 1981;Reissner, 1975;Shi, 2007Shi, , 2011) is in essential equivalent to the third-order model (i.e. Model-A) because of Eq.…”
Section: Shear Correction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In virtue of this, much attention was paid to evaluating the shear correction factor (e.g. Cowper, 1966;Dong et al, 2013Dong et al, , 2010Gruttmann and Wagner, 2001;Gruttmann et al, 1999;Hutchinson, 2001;Jensen, 1983;Kaneko, 1975;Pai and Schulz, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the Timoshenko beam theory (TBT), the shear strain distribution is incorrectly assumed to be constant throughout the beam height; e.g., considering a simple rectangular cross-section, such hypothesis does not respect the zero shear strain and stress boundary conditions at its top and bottom. Therefore, a shear correction factor is required to accurately determine the strain energy of deformation, which has deserved the attention of researchers since the 1950s up to the present day [9,10,14,16]. Within the framework of this chapter, classical beam theories are considered to be of the first-order, i.e., those in which the displacement fields inside the cross-section are linear functions on each of the cross-sectional coordinates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindlin (1952) proposed constant and Poisson-ratiodependent shear correction factors based on the free vibration data of the homogeneous and isotropic plates. An overview and elaborate discussion on the correction factors for flexural vibrations of the Timoshenko beams was presented by Kaneko (1975). Some shear correction factors had been derived for beams with various cross sections (Cowper, 1966;Murthy, 1970;Hutchinson, 1981;Rebello et al, 1983;Wittrick, 1987;Stephen, 1997;Pai and Schulz, 1999;Gruttmann and Wagner, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%