2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498816500468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On topological lattices and their applications to module theory

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce the notion of a (strongly) topological lattice L = (L, ∧, ∨) with respect to a subset X L; a prototype is the lattice of (two-sided) ideals of a ring R, which is (strongly) topological with respect to the prime spectrum of R. We investigate and characterize (strongly) topological lattices. Given a non-zero left R-module M, we introduce and investigate the spectrum Spec f (M ) of first submodules of M. We topologize Spec f (M ) and investigate the algebraic properties of R M by passing to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that Theorem 2.6 recovers several results of Abuhlail on such 1-1 correspondences for L = LAT ( R M) (e.g. [2], [3], [4]) and Abuhlail/Lomp [1] as special cases (some of these results are recovered under conditions weaker than those assumed in the original results for the different spectra of modules).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that Theorem 2.6 recovers several results of Abuhlail on such 1-1 correspondences for L = LAT ( R M) (e.g. [2], [3], [4]) and Abuhlail/Lomp [1] as special cases (some of these results are recovered under conditions weaker than those assumed in the original results for the different spectra of modules).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…If R M has the property that H(A) is first whenever A is irreducible, then SH(H (L)) ⊆ X and so the 1-1 correspondences of Theorem 2.6 hold. This was proved under the same condition in [1].…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation