2021
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6618
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On topology optimization of design‐dependent pressure‐loaded three‐dimensional structures and compliant mechanisms

Abstract: This article presents a density‐based topology optimization method for designing three‐dimensional (3D) compliant mechanisms (CMs) and loadbearing structures with design‐dependent pressure loading. Instead of interface‐tracking techniques, the Darcy law in conjunction with a drainage term is employed to obtain pressure field as a function of the design vector. To ensure continuous transition of pressure loads as the design evolves, the flow coefficient of a finite element (FE) is defined using a smooth Heavisi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method, Picelli et al [33,34] used Laplace's equation and the steady-state incompressible Navier-Stokes equations to control the static fluid domain and the fluid flow domain, respectively, and constructed the corresponding fluid-structure coupling equations to solve the design-dependent pressure load problem. Kumar et al [35,36] modeled the design-dependent pressure loads on structures and compliant mechanisms using Darcy's law coupled with a "drainage" term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method, Picelli et al [33,34] used Laplace's equation and the steady-state incompressible Navier-Stokes equations to control the static fluid domain and the fluid flow domain, respectively, and constructed the corresponding fluid-structure coupling equations to solve the design-dependent pressure load problem. Kumar et al [35,36] modeled the design-dependent pressure loads on structures and compliant mechanisms using Darcy's law coupled with a "drainage" term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammer and Olhoff (2000) were the first to model pressure load in a TO framework for designing loadbearing structures. Many approaches have been proposed after that; see Picelli et al (2019); Kumar et al (2020); Kumar and Langelaar (2021) for the comprehensive lists. In a typical TO environment with a design-dependent pressure load, an ideal approach is expected to provide suitable solutions to the following challenges (C i ):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is expected to open a potential direction towards developing soft robots using TO (Kumar, 2023). Further, the method is readily extended for optimizing 3D loadbearing designs and pressure-driven compliant mechanisms in Kumar and Langelaar (2021). Therefore, this paper adopts the approach herein for developing the proposed code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design-dependent loads typically alter their location, magnitude and/or direction as TO progresses and therefore, their sensitivities with respect to the design variables need to be accounted in the TO formulation (Kumar and Langelaar, 2021;Kumar et al, 2020). In such loading scenarios, the overall sensitivities of the compliance objective with respect to the design variables no more remain always negative (see Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%