2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.08742
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On tracial $\mathcal Z$-stability of simple non-unital C*-algebras

Abstract: We investigate the notion of tracial Z-stability beyond unital C * -algebras, and we prove that this notion is equivalent to Z-stability in the class of separable simple nuclear C * -algebras.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 4.14. We note that the implication from (TAD-2) to the uniform McDuff property is also proved in [8,Proposition 4.6].…”
Section: Tracial Approximate Divisibilitymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 4.14. We note that the implication from (TAD-2) to the uniform McDuff property is also proved in [8,Proposition 4.6].…”
Section: Tracial Approximate Divisibilitymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Remark 5.3. It is worth noting that Theorem 5.2 has also been independently proved in [8] with a different point of view. More precisely, [8,Theorem 3.2] shows that (non-unital) σ-unital simple C * -algebras with (TAD-2) have strict comparison.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence (2) follows from a result of Matui-Sato (see, explicitly, Corollary 5.11 and Proposition 5.12 of [32], for example) in the unital case. For non-unital case, we take a detour and use the result in [11]. In this case, since T (A 1 ) is compact, A 1 is uniformly McDuff (see Definition 4.1 of [11], or Definition 4.2 of [10]).…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-unital case, we take a detour and use the result in [11]. In this case, since T (A 1 ) is compact, A 1 is uniformly McDuff (see Definition 4.1 of [11], or Definition 4.2 of [10]). Since A 1 has strict comparison, by Proposition 4.4 of [11] (also a version of Matui-Sato's result), we conclude that A 1 ∼ = A 1 ⊗ Z.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%