2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2020.107319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On tunnel numbers of a cable knot and its companion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schirmer [34] showed that this is true when the wrapping number is 1; that is, for composite knots. Wang and Zou [48] showed that the tunnel number of a cable knot is at least the tunnel number of its companion. Li [24] has shown that t(T ) is at least that of its pattern; however, it seems to be an open problem whether or not it is at least that of the companion K. Our work points towards some of the difficulties of proving this and the existence of counter-examples to Schubert's inequality when g = 1 perhaps indicates some skepticism is in order.…”
Section: Comparisons and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schirmer [34] showed that this is true when the wrapping number is 1; that is, for composite knots. Wang and Zou [48] showed that the tunnel number of a cable knot is at least the tunnel number of its companion. Li [24] has shown that t(T ) is at least that of its pattern; however, it seems to be an open problem whether or not it is at least that of the companion K. Our work points towards some of the difficulties of proving this and the existence of counter-examples to Schubert's inequality when g = 1 perhaps indicates some skepticism is in order.…”
Section: Comparisons and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%