1996
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-96-03094-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On two–block–factor sequences and one–dependence

Abstract: Abstract. The distributions of two-block-factors (f (η i , η i+1 ); i ≥ 1) arising from i.i.d. sequences (η i ; i ≥ 1) are observed to coincide with the distributions of the superdiagonals (ζ i,i+1 ; i ≥ 1) of jointly exchangeable and dissociated arrays (ζ i,j ; i, j ≥ 1). An inequality for superdiagonal probabilities of the arrays is presented. It provides, together with the observation, a simple proof of the fact that a special one-dependent Markov sequence of Aaronson, Gilat and Keane (1992) is not a two-bl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 In fact, a Markov process can be q-dependent. Lévy (1949), Rosenblatt and Slepian (1962), Aaronson, Gilat, and Keane (1992), and Matús (1996and Matús ( , 1998 provide examples of a q-dependent Markov process. Ibragimov (2007) provides the conditions that a Markov process is a q-dependent process.…”
Section: Asymptotic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In fact, a Markov process can be q-dependent. Lévy (1949), Rosenblatt and Slepian (1962), Aaronson, Gilat, and Keane (1992), and Matús (1996and Matús ( , 1998 provide examples of a q-dependent Markov process. Ibragimov (2007) provides the conditions that a Markov process is a q-dependent process.…”
Section: Asymptotic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While finitely dependent processes enjoyed significant attention in the intervening years [1, 2, 16-18, 23, 35, 36, 53], it was only in 1993 that Ibragimov and Linnik's question was resolved in the affirmative by Burton, Goulet, and Meester [14]. Many subsequent works [11,13,19,37,43,46,47] explored the properties of such processes, but the question remained: are there 'natural' stationary finitely dependent processes that are not block-factors?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question and the surrounding issues have been taken up by a number of authors [1, 7-10, 14, 16, 18, 24, 26, 31, 34, 35, 40], and various further examples have been constructed. Highlights include an explicit 1-dependent (5state) Markov chain that is not a 2-block factor [1], a (hidden-Markov) 1-dependent process that is not an r-block-factor for any r (Burton, Goulet and Meester, 1993 [8]), and a "perturbable" example showing that 2-block-factors are not dense in the set of 1-dependent Markov chains [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%