1978
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(78)90049-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On typical characteristics of economic time series and the relative qualities of five autocorrelation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further investigate the robustness of our findings, various other X-matrix specifications were tried, including (i) use of boolean (dummy) vectors, as would be used, for example, when working with models with outliers or structural breaks, and (ii) the matrix E k , specified as the first k eigenvectors of the first order difference matrix, for various values of k. Matrix E k is given by x it = cos[(2t − 1)π(i − 1)/(2T )] (see Durbin and Watson, 1971), and is a useful benchmark because these vectors tend to mimic the behavior of economic time series with seasonal and cyclical-type behavior (Dubbelman, Louter and Abrahamse, 1978;King, 1985, p. 32). For all X-matrices considered, the ranges for which the respective estimators perform best were virtually identical.…”
Section: Results For Other Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further investigate the robustness of our findings, various other X-matrix specifications were tried, including (i) use of boolean (dummy) vectors, as would be used, for example, when working with models with outliers or structural breaks, and (ii) the matrix E k , specified as the first k eigenvectors of the first order difference matrix, for various values of k. Matrix E k is given by x it = cos[(2t − 1)π(i − 1)/(2T )] (see Durbin and Watson, 1971), and is a useful benchmark because these vectors tend to mimic the behavior of economic time series with seasonal and cyclical-type behavior (Dubbelman, Louter and Abrahamse, 1978;King, 1985, p. 32). For all X-matrices considered, the ranges for which the respective estimators perform best were virtually identical.…”
Section: Results For Other Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Durbin andWatson 1950, 1971) and the references therein), the optimality of the test breaks down in either the non-circular model and/or with arbitrary exogenous X, but does provide strong motivation for an approximately UMPU test in the general setting considered here. This is particularly so for economic time series, as they typically exhibit seasonal (i.e., cyclical) behavior that can mimic the Fourier regressors in (8) (Dubbelman et al 1978;King 1985, p. 32).…”
Section: Conditional Distributions and Umpu Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dubbelman et al (1978) and Hendry and Richardson (1983) have therefore stressed the need for an assumed model to encompass competing specifications, in other words, the need for a null model to be able to predict the performance of viable alternative specifications "significantly well." This is the main role of nonnested testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their basic ideas have been adapted to linear regression models by Pesaran (1974) and to nonlinear regression models by Pesaran and Deaton (1978). Dubbelman et al (1978), McAleer (1987), and Berger et al (1988) provided excellent introductions to the theory and application of nonnested tests. Other relevant works in this area include those developed by Pesaran and Pesaran (1993), Huth et al (1993), Silvapulle and King (1993), McAleer (1995), Fan and Li (1995), Godfrey (1998), Berger and Mortera (1999), Davidson and Mackinnon (1981, 2002, Timm and Al-Subaihi (2001), and Watnik et al (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%