2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2020.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On unimodular multilinear forms with small norms on sequence spaces

Abstract: The Kahane-Salem-Zygmund inequality is a probabilistic result that guarantees the existence of special matrices with entries 1 and −1 generating unimodular m-linear forms Am,n : ℓ n p 1 ×· · ·×ℓ n pm −→ R (or C) with relatively small norms. The optimal asymptotic estimates for the smallest possible norms of Am,n when {p1, ..., pm} ⊂ [2, ∞] and when {p1, ..., pm} ⊂ [1, 2) are well-known and in this paper we obtain the optimal asymptotic estimates for the remaining case: {p1, ..., pm} intercepts both [2, ∞] and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in many instances, deterministic arguments are not available and probabilistic methods come into play. In the 1970's and 1980's several authors have followed this vein (see [4,11,15,16,21]) and nowadays these probabilistic approaches are explored in different lines of research (see [2,3,6,7,8,10,12,13,14,17,19] and the references therein). In general, the probabilistic arguments are enough to provide optimal exponents but the constants involved are not precise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many instances, deterministic arguments are not available and probabilistic methods come into play. In the 1970's and 1980's several authors have followed this vein (see [4,11,15,16,21]) and nowadays these probabilistic approaches are explored in different lines of research (see [2,3,6,7,8,10,12,13,14,17,19] and the references therein). In general, the probabilistic arguments are enough to provide optimal exponents but the constants involved are not precise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%