2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30487-4_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Unsupervised Learning of Traversal Cost and Terrain Types Identification Using Self-organizing Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, several works have been proposed for the in-situ classification of terrain types, based exclusively on proprioceptive data while actually experiencing the traverse on the (potentially dangerous) terrain [ 88 , 89 ]. Among the works reported in the present survey, a recent and more frequently adopted approach consists of using proprioceptive data during training as well as for data labeling [ 34 , 35 , 66 ]. This approach has already proved to provide better classification and regression results compared to those methods based on exteroceptive data only, although only the latter are used at deployment time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the past, several works have been proposed for the in-situ classification of terrain types, based exclusively on proprioceptive data while actually experiencing the traverse on the (potentially dangerous) terrain [ 88 , 89 ]. Among the works reported in the present survey, a recent and more frequently adopted approach consists of using proprioceptive data during training as well as for data labeling [ 34 , 35 , 66 ]. This approach has already proved to provide better classification and regression results compared to those methods based on exteroceptive data only, although only the latter are used at deployment time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faigl and Prágr [ 34 ] emphasised the need to define generalizable traversal costs and, with this idea, they considered instantaneous power consumption, maximum achievable forward velocity, and attitude stability. These measures can be used regardless of the specific type of platform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Traversability labels in exteroceptive-based methods ignore the robot's internal states while in motion across the terrain; hence, the degree of traversability is unknown, and the labels are usually binary (i.e., untraversable and traversable). In contrast, proprioceptive approaches can model terrain traversability as a continuous variable by defining a traversability cost using ground reaction score [11], vibration [12] or stability [13] from a proprioceptive sensor modality. However, these metrics are chosen based on a user's domain knowledge and may not fully capture the traversability experienced by the robot itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%