2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Using Organizational Knowledge Capabilities to Assist Organizational Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic panel estimation also reveals that the estimated coefficient of company size (SIZE i,t ) on performance is statistically positive and significant at the 99 percent confidence level, indicating that one percentage point increase in SIZE i,t would be reflected in 0.0648 percentage point increase in PERFroa i,t . The positive relationship is consistent with the findings of past studies (Chang & Thomas, 1989;Majumdar, 1997;Mukherji et al, 1997;Dimson et al, 2002;Schwert, 2003;Mohd Ali, 2006;Aljifri & Moustafa, 2007;Yang & Chen, 2009;Saliha & Abdessatar, 2011;Muritala, 2012;Kipesha, 2013;Chaibi et al, 2014;Akben-Selcuk, 2016) hence, it verifies the importance of size in influencing the performance of the Malaysian listed companies. The result also reported that corporate performance is negatively (positively) afffected by RISKSTDroa i,t (FSlack i,t ), but the relationship is only marginally significant at the 90 percent confidence level.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dynamic panel estimation also reveals that the estimated coefficient of company size (SIZE i,t ) on performance is statistically positive and significant at the 99 percent confidence level, indicating that one percentage point increase in SIZE i,t would be reflected in 0.0648 percentage point increase in PERFroa i,t . The positive relationship is consistent with the findings of past studies (Chang & Thomas, 1989;Majumdar, 1997;Mukherji et al, 1997;Dimson et al, 2002;Schwert, 2003;Mohd Ali, 2006;Aljifri & Moustafa, 2007;Yang & Chen, 2009;Saliha & Abdessatar, 2011;Muritala, 2012;Kipesha, 2013;Chaibi et al, 2014;Akben-Selcuk, 2016) hence, it verifies the importance of size in influencing the performance of the Malaysian listed companies. The result also reported that corporate performance is negatively (positively) afffected by RISKSTDroa i,t (FSlack i,t ), but the relationship is only marginally significant at the 90 percent confidence level.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Schwert (2003) suggests that the size effect appears to be reversed because practitioners begin to utilize investment tools which enable them to exploit the small-firm anomaly for their portfolio maximisation. Some studies have shown that large firms have a direct impact on performance due to the ability in operating business efficiently (Kumar, 2004;Bos & Kolari, 2005;Van Biesebroeck, 2005;Aljifri & Moustafa, 2007), utilizing economies of scales and dominating the market (Bain, 1954;Kumar, 2004;Serrasqueiro & Macas Nunes, 2008), experiencing more business diversification (Yang & Chen, 2009), having greater financial resources (Arora & Gambardella, 1990) and diversifying risk efficiently (Ghosh, 1998;Bossone & Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge management is considered complementary to organizational capabilities that contribute to organizational success, and a successful organizational learning (OL) process depends on well-established knowledge management infrastructure, which includes both social and technical enablers. However, previous studies, which examined the relationship between knowledge management and OL, considered knowledge management from a process perspective and not from a socio-technical perspective (Yang and Chen, 2009; Sanz-Valle et al , 2011; Jain and Moreno, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic importance of this study lies in its contribution to the existing literature by linking resource-based organizational capabilities and inter-organizational practices with OP. Few studies investigated the relationship between KMC and OL process from a socio-technical perspective (Noruzy et al , 2013; Sanz-Valle et al , 2011; Yang and Chen, 2009), especially in developing countries (Jain and Moreno, 2015; Nafei, 2014). In addition, limited studies examined the link between resource-based organizational capabilities, including knowledge management and inter-organizational coordination, namely, SCMP (Tan and Cross, 2012; Wong and Wong, 2011; Xu et al , 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the lack of a complete KM vision exists due to a focus on purely technological aspects. In this context, we seek to strengthen the claim of Davenport (2015) and others (Abualoush et al, 2018; Brahma & Mishra, 2015; Chuang, 2004; Gunjal, 2019; Salama, 2017; Yang & Chen, 2009), that KM is not just about technology. It has intertwined aspects that cover strategy, content and context, knowledge flow processes, definition of role holders, technology, culture, and people (Gunjal, 2019; Handzic, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%