NOMS 2008 - 2008 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/noms.2008.4575128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
86
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the proposed weighted multiplicative utility form in Proposition 5.1 can be eventually used to properly model the user acceptance probability. Hence, we have: (27) As demonstrated in the proof of Proposition 5.1, this weighted multiplicative aggregate form fully satisfies the conditions (24), (25) and (26).…”
Section: Proposed Multi-criteria Utility Functionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that the proposed weighted multiplicative utility form in Proposition 5.1 can be eventually used to properly model the user acceptance probability. Hence, we have: (27) As demonstrated in the proof of Proposition 5.1, this weighted multiplicative aggregate form fully satisfies the conditions (24), (25) and (26).…”
Section: Proposed Multi-criteria Utility Functionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For sake of brevity, we remind the reader to [26] and [27] for a complete state-of-the-art on single criterion utility functions and their main characteristics. Here, we provide the key concepts as well as the identified properties which are required in the area of network selection.…”
Section: A New Single-criterion Utility Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher the path weight value the more traffic is routed through that path. It has been shown, that in case of decision making problems, the main drawback of using a simple additive weighted function is that a poor value for one parameter (e.g., heavily loaded link) could be heavily out-weighted by a very good value of another parameter [35] values. For example, in our case, considering a path with multiple hops on which several link segments present a light load but only one link is heavily loaded.…”
Section: B Problem Description and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%