2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-008-9337-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Weierstrass semigroups and sets: a review with new results

Abstract: In this work we present a survey of the main results in the theory of Weierstrass semigroups at several points, with special attention to the determination of bounds for the cardinality of its set of gaps. We also review results on applications to the theory of error correcting codes. We then recall a generalization of the concept of Weierstrass semigroup, which is the Weierstrass set associated to a linear system and several points. We finish by presenting new results on this Weierstrass set, including some o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the above discussion we have the following result. where δ is the designed minimum distance of the code given in (5).…”
Section: Background and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the above discussion we have the following result. where δ is the designed minimum distance of the code given in (5).…”
Section: Background and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.3. From (8), a lower bound for the minimum distance of (7) is δ + 3(q + 1 − m 0 ) with δ designed minimum distance given in (5).…”
Section: Improvements On the Matthews-michel Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , a n ) ∈ N n such that there is a rational function on X with a 1 P 1 + · · · + a n P n as its divisor of poles ( [1], [2]). The set H(P 1 , .…”
Section: Ordinary Weierstrass N-semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m. The set of pure gaps of X at Q will be denoted by G 0 (Q); for further information concerning these objects, we refer the reader to the survey [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%