1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00766599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Weyl's gauge field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its vector potential is the Weyl vector, and its strength is Weyl's segmental curvature tensor arising in the geometrical interpretation of the theory together with the curvature and torsion tensors. The dilatation gauge field does not coincide with electromagnetic field (that has been asserted by Weyl in his basic work [2]) but represents a field of another type [3]. In particular, quanta of this field can have nonzero rest masses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its vector potential is the Weyl vector, and its strength is Weyl's segmental curvature tensor arising in the geometrical interpretation of the theory together with the curvature and torsion tensors. The dilatation gauge field does not coincide with electromagnetic field (that has been asserted by Weyl in his basic work [2]) but represents a field of another type [3]. In particular, quanta of this field can have nonzero rest masses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in contrast to [27], [28], this Lagrangian retains gauge invariance but allows a nonzero mass for the quantum of the Weyl nonmetricity vector field and hence also for the dilatation gauge field. This suggests that the gauge field introduced in localizing the group of scale transformations is not an electromagnetic field (in contrast to Weyl's initial idea) but a field of a different nature, as indicated in [40]- [42]. The existence of the Weyl field mass can play a positive role in interpreting modern observational data based on using post-Riemannian cosmological models [37], [38] and also in possibly explaining a graceful exit from the inflationary stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Bramson (1974) gives a spinor formulation. Pandres and Zund (1974) derive them from Dirac's (1973) theory-which is identical in structure to the theories proposed by Omote (1971Omote ( , 1974, Lord (1972), Freund (1974 and Utiyama (1975) -Hoyle andNarlikar (1964, 1974) derive them as a smooth-fluid approximation to their conformally invariant action-at-a-distance theory, and most recently Canuto er a1 (1977) have used the same equations, i.e. invariant under the transformation 0305-4470/79/030367 + 07$01.00 @ 1979 The Institute of Physics Now, in units with c = h = 1 so that length and time are measured with the same unit and mass with the inverse length unit (the mass of a particle m is given by m = qu where q is a dimensionless constant associated with the particle, called its inertial charge), the transformation (2) represents a space-time-dependent change in the length unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%