1961
DOI: 10.4064/aa-6-4-505-521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Weyl's inequality and Waring's problem for cubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Theorem 1 of Chowla and Davenport [10] establishes the same conclusion as Theorem 1 above in the special case where (x, y) is a binary cubic form with nonzero discriminant. In cases where d > 3, meanwhile, the conclusion of Theorem 1 provides substantially sharper estimates than would be available through the work of Birch [4] and Schmidt [25].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Theorem 1 of Chowla and Davenport [10] establishes the same conclusion as Theorem 1 above in the special case where (x, y) is a binary cubic form with nonzero discriminant. In cases where d > 3, meanwhile, the conclusion of Theorem 1 provides substantially sharper estimates than would be available through the work of Birch [4] and Schmidt [25].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Such arguments being rather lengthy, technical, and in any case limited in their application, we have chosen to present the main thrust of our ideas and defer any such considerations to a possible future occasion. We note that when d = 3 and the underlying form has nonzero discriminant, then one may establish the main conclusion of Theorem 2 through the methods of Chowla and Davenport [10] (see Lemma 4.1 of Brüdern and Wooley [9]). Finally, when d is larger than 11 or so, it is possible to apply a trivial argument involving Vinogradov's methods in order to obtain conclusions superior to those stemming from Theorem 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chowla and Davenport [6] tried to generalise (1) by considering the form Hence no such solution can exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence no such solution can exist. Chowla and Davenport [6] tried to generalise (1) by considering the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question now arises as to whether one can break away from the diagonal situation when the number of variables does not exceed 8. A first attempt was made by Chowla & Davenport (1961) over three decades ago. They considered binary cubic forms Φ j ∈ Z[x, y] (j = 1, 2, 3) with non-zero discriminant, and showed the existence of a non-trivial solution of the diophantine equation Φ 1 (x 1 , y 1 ) + Φ 2 (x 2 , y 2 ) + Φ 3 (x 3 , y 3 ) + ax 3 4 + by 3 4 = 0, where a, b ∈ Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%