Self-Criticism and Self-Enhancement: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications. 2008
DOI: 10.1037/11624-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On when self-enhancement and self-criticism function adaptively and maladaptively.

Abstract: It would be an understatement of sorts to point out that modern life places excessive demands on the individual. The busyness of the workplace, the necessity or unavoidability of job changes and the accompanying relocation, the ephemerality of friendships, and the expendability of even family relationships contribute to increased nuance and higher plasticity in the interplay between the individual and the social world. The ebb and flow of these demands is bound to exert its toll on a person's emotional fabric,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, as the distant future entails a higher-level construal, its representation is likely to be more schematic and theory-based. Given the prevalent human tendency to construe the self in a favorable light whenever possible (Alicke & Govorun, 2005;Dunning, 2005;Kunda, 1990;Sedikides, 2009;Sedikides & Luke, 2008), individuals will be especially prone to base their construal of distant future selves on their rose-colored theories regarding experiencing positive events and feelings, possessing positive attributes, and continuous improvement over time (Heckhausen & Krueger, 1993;Regan et al, 1995;Sedikides & Hepper, 2009). Thus, the distant future perspective will evoke predictions of more positive (and less negative) affect, more positive (and less negative) traits, and more positive (and less negative) self-narratives, compared to the near future perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, as the distant future entails a higher-level construal, its representation is likely to be more schematic and theory-based. Given the prevalent human tendency to construe the self in a favorable light whenever possible (Alicke & Govorun, 2005;Dunning, 2005;Kunda, 1990;Sedikides, 2009;Sedikides & Luke, 2008), individuals will be especially prone to base their construal of distant future selves on their rose-colored theories regarding experiencing positive events and feelings, possessing positive attributes, and continuous improvement over time (Heckhausen & Krueger, 1993;Regan et al, 1995;Sedikides & Hepper, 2009). Thus, the distant future perspective will evoke predictions of more positive (and less negative) affect, more positive (and less negative) traits, and more positive (and less negative) self-narratives, compared to the near future perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…depression, anxiety, neuroticism) (Dunning, 2005;Marshall & Brown, 2007;Sedikides, Gregg, & Hart, 2008). However, if self-protection becomes entrenched, so may failure to learn and develop from one's range of experiences (Colvin & Griffo, 2007;Sedikides, 1999;Sedikides & Luke, 2007).…”
Section: Self-evaluation As a Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicating the relation between self-enhancement and self-protection is complicated by the fact that some psychological theories and phenomena primarily involve one of these motives, some entail both, and in some instances, self-protective efforts further self-enhancement goals (Sedikides & Green, in press;Sedikides & Luke, 2007;Sedikides & Strube, 1997). For example, individuals are relatively open to negative feedback (Kumashiro & Sedikides, 2005) or remember it well (Green, Sedikides, Pinter, & Van Tongeren, in press) when such openness or efficient memory enables future task performance or enable good interpersonal relationships.…”
Section: Relation Between Self-enhancement and Self-protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%