2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(00)00107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On (Z2)k actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we determine all possible equivariant cobordism classes of G-actions (M, Φ), Φ = (T 1 , T 2 ), for which F Φ is connected, dim(F Φ ) = n and dim(M ) = 4n−1 or 4n−2; here, F Φ is the fixed point set of Φ, that is, F Φ = {x ∈ M / T i (x) = x, i = 1, 2}. We remark that, for dim(M ) ≥ 4n, this type of classification was established in [3]. To state the results, we need to describe certain G-actions (M, Φ) with F Φ connected and n-dimensional, and with dim(M ) = 4n−1 and 4n−2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Specifically, we determine all possible equivariant cobordism classes of G-actions (M, Φ), Φ = (T 1 , T 2 ), for which F Φ is connected, dim(F Φ ) = n and dim(M ) = 4n−1 or 4n−2; here, F Φ is the fixed point set of Φ, that is, F Φ = {x ∈ M / T i (x) = x, i = 1, 2}. We remark that, for dim(M ) ≥ 4n, this type of classification was established in [3]. To state the results, we need to describe certain G-actions (M, Φ) with F Φ connected and n-dimensional, and with dim(M ) = 4n−1 and 4n−2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We will apply this using certain special classes, which are polynomials in the above-displayed ones, and were initially introduced in [4] and also used in [5] and in [6]. The argument is identical with that of [6; part a) of Lemma of Section 3]; to ease the reading and mainly to establish some notations, we will rewrite it.…”
Section: Proofs Of the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to generalize Theorem 2 would be an extension of the Pergher's result of [6] to F n ∪ F n−1 : if (M m , ) is a Z k 2 -action whose fixed set F has the form F = F n ∪ F n−1 , where F n and F n−1 are connected, and if m > 2 k n, then (M m , ) bounds equivariantly. Again we are not able to handle this situation, even in the case k = 2.…”
Section: Proofs Of the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, T k , and the fixed data of Φ is η = ε → F, where F is the fixed point set of Φ and η = ε is the normal bundle of F in M m decomposed into eigenbundles ε with running through the 2 k − 1 nontrivial irreducible representations of Z k 2 . For example, see [12] (F = real projective space RP 2n and k = 1), [3] (F with constant dimension n, dim(η) ≥ n and k = 1), [2, Section 31] (F = a set of isolated points and k = 2), [10] (F = union of two real projective spaces and k = 1) and [5] (F = a connected n-dimensional manifold, dim(η) ≥ (2 k − 1)n and any k).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%