2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2971938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onboard Detection and Localization of Drones Using Depth Maps

Abstract: Obstacle avoidance is a key feature for safe drone navigation. While solutions are already commercially available for static obstacle avoidance, systems enabling avoidance of dynamic objects, such as drones, are much harder to develop due to the efficient perception, planning and control capabilities required, particularly in small drones with constrained takeoff weights. For reasonable performance, obstacle detection systems should be capable of running in real-time, with sufficient field-of-view (FOV) and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a final simulation test, we verified that the SLAM-like assumption of the anchor estimated positions âi cannot be considered as a random variable, as discussed in Section IV-B. To empirically prove this fact, we have carried out 10 6 Monte Carlo trials where δ i uncertainty is treated as a random variable contributing to the random, zero-mean white noise in (10) and hence applying the multilateration (5), which results in the position uncertainty in Figure 9, dashed line. As can be noticed, this assumption end up with a non-negligible bias on the estimates of the estimated position ŝk (the Figure 9 reports the bias on the xk axis, but it acts similarly on ŷk ).…”
Section: Simulations and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As a final simulation test, we verified that the SLAM-like assumption of the anchor estimated positions âi cannot be considered as a random variable, as discussed in Section IV-B. To empirically prove this fact, we have carried out 10 6 Monte Carlo trials where δ i uncertainty is treated as a random variable contributing to the random, zero-mean white noise in (10) and hence applying the multilateration (5), which results in the position uncertainty in Figure 9, dashed line. As can be noticed, this assumption end up with a non-negligible bias on the estimates of the estimated position ŝk (the Figure 9 reports the bias on the xk axis, but it acts similarly on ŷk ).…”
Section: Simulations and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Carrio et al (24) used AirSim to train a CNN detection network with 16 layers by automatically labelling depth maps. Depth maps were obtained by stereo-matching of the Red-Green-Blue (RGB) image pairs of the virtual ZED stereo camera on the AirSim drone.…”
Section: Drone Detection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A probléma az, hogy nem egyformán tudunk kis méretű mozgó tárgyakat és nagyobb méretűeket érzékelni. A különböző gyártók már használnak a fedélzeten statikus (álló) akadályok elkerülését szolgáló rendszereket, de dinamikus (mozgó) akadályok elkerülése ennél jóval bonyolultabb kihívást jelent technológiailag [15].…”
Section: Légi Járművek öSszeütközését Megakadályozó Műszaki Megoldásokunclassified