2013
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer at various clinical stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
55
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
55
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this study, the mutation rate in patients with well-differentiated tumors was 83.33%, in patients with moderately differentiated tumors 46.43% and in patients with poorly differentiated tumors 41.18%, which was inconsistent with previous findings (3). This inconsistency may be attributed to the lack of well-differentiated cases in this study; therefore a larger sample size is required to confirm this result (11,22). In addition, no statistical association was observed between lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and EGFR mutation (P>0.05), which was in agreement with the findings of Li et al (1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this study, the mutation rate in patients with well-differentiated tumors was 83.33%, in patients with moderately differentiated tumors 46.43% and in patients with poorly differentiated tumors 41.18%, which was inconsistent with previous findings (3). This inconsistency may be attributed to the lack of well-differentiated cases in this study; therefore a larger sample size is required to confirm this result (11,22). In addition, no statistical association was observed between lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and EGFR mutation (P>0.05), which was in agreement with the findings of Li et al (1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although there have been significant advances in the comprehensive treatment of lung cancer, the 5-year survival rate and life quality of the patients remain very low (11). The traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with significant toxicity and side effects due to the lack of specificity (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ALK rearrangements have been found in older patients and smokers (34), squamous cell and adenosquamous carcinoma cases (35, 36), and rarely, patients with mutations in EGFR , Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS ), and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase ( BRAF ) (20 –22, 37, 38). Although the triage of samples based on clinicopathological features does increase the success rate of detection of ALK rearrangements (33), it is not an optimal strategy, since a portion of patients who could benefit from ALK inhibitors would unavoidably be excluded (4, 39, 40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study of resected lung adenocarcinomas, however, found that ALK or ROS1 fusion-positive tumors have a significantly poorer disease free survival on multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender, T stage, N stage and adjuvant chemotherapy use (p ÂŒ 0.022; hazard ratio, 2.11) 2 . Another study of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer at various clinical stages found that stage IIIA EML4-ALK positive patients has a worse disease free survival on multivariate analyses, further establishing the oncogene addicted nature of these tumors 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%