2019
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncologic Accuracy of Image-guided Percutaneous Core-Needle Biopsy of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors at a High-volume Sarcoma Center

Abstract: Objectives: Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are clinically heterogenous, comprising benign (BPNST) and malignant (MPNST) variants. BPNSTs can be managed with nerve-sparing excision or observation. MPNSTs require radical resection and multidisciplinary oncologic management (1, 15). Image-guided core-needle biopsy (IGCNBx) is the well-established standard to obtain preoperative tissue diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. However, there has been resistance to performing IGCNBx of PNSTs because of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in current practice, confirmation of MPNST identified by clinical/imaging suspicion is usually attempted by solid tumor biopsy, which can be exquisitely painful given the peripheral nerve site, is often technically difficult due to lesions’ propensity for localizing to viscera and the retroperitoneum, and is associated with serious complications including nerve palsy and dissemination of malignant tumor cells [ 53 ]. Additionally, biopsy is not without diagnostic caveat, as the development of MPNST from within PN lesions causes sampling bias with image-guided biopsies shown to result in low negative predictive value (NPV), with 50% of NF1 patients diagnosed with PN on image-guided core-needle biopsy being subsequently reclassified as MPNST following surgical resection in one retrospective study [ 19 ]. Unlike image-guided tumor biopsy, our liquid biopsy approach to measure tumor fraction reflects chromosomal instability throughout the body, thus limiting the potential for sampling bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in current practice, confirmation of MPNST identified by clinical/imaging suspicion is usually attempted by solid tumor biopsy, which can be exquisitely painful given the peripheral nerve site, is often technically difficult due to lesions’ propensity for localizing to viscera and the retroperitoneum, and is associated with serious complications including nerve palsy and dissemination of malignant tumor cells [ 53 ]. Additionally, biopsy is not without diagnostic caveat, as the development of MPNST from within PN lesions causes sampling bias with image-guided biopsies shown to result in low negative predictive value (NPV), with 50% of NF1 patients diagnosed with PN on image-guided core-needle biopsy being subsequently reclassified as MPNST following surgical resection in one retrospective study [ 19 ]. Unlike image-guided tumor biopsy, our liquid biopsy approach to measure tumor fraction reflects chromosomal instability throughout the body, thus limiting the potential for sampling bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serial PN biopsies are impractical as 9% to 21% of NF1 patients will have multiple PN, with varying levels of malignant potential requiring surveillance [ 16 18 ]. Moreover, biopsies can yield false negative results due to geographic tumor heterogeneity resulting from MPNST arising from within heterogeneous PN precursor lesions [ 19 ]. Furthermore, standard cross-sectional imaging cannot distinguish MPNST from PN with adequate specificity [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IGCNBx demonstrating schwannoma or MPNST were 100% accurate in determining malignancy. On the other hand, out of 12 neurofibromas diagnosed on IGCNBx, four (33%) proved to be MPNSTs on postresection surgical pathology [39]. This discrepancy is likely because of the heterogeneous nature of neurofibromas.…”
Section: Case Reports In Pathologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Imaging plays an important role in diagnostic work-up, as biopsies are cumbersome in NF1 patients especially since they may be painful and result in persisting nerve damage [42]. Additionally, in NF1 patients, sampling errors are common [43,44]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used but may be inadequate to detect and especially distinguish benign and malignant lesions [45,46].…”
Section: Imaging Of Mpnstmentioning
confidence: 99%