2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncologic Outcomes of Oral Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage III Colon Cancer: Tegafur–Uracil Plus Leucovorin Versus Capecitabine

Abstract: The 3-year RFS and OS were similar for both regimens, yielding an excellent outcome. The selection of adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens must be based on the patient's status as well as considering the incidences of adverse events, medical cost, and administration convenience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our database search identified 2341 publications after removal of duplicates. After an initial screen, 205 articles were reviewed in full, from which 34 studies (9 randomized trials 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 and 25 observational studies 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ) were deemed eligible for inclusion. There was strong agreement between the 2 reviewers at both the initial screen and the full-text screen (percentage agreement >90% and κ > 0.6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our database search identified 2341 publications after removal of duplicates. After an initial screen, 205 articles were reviewed in full, from which 34 studies (9 randomized trials 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 and 25 observational studies 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ) were deemed eligible for inclusion. There was strong agreement between the 2 reviewers at both the initial screen and the full-text screen (percentage agreement >90% and κ > 0.6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we excluded the studies by Ahn et al 25 and by Yaich et al 47 because we were unable to obtain an effect estimate suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis and we were unable to reach these authors for further details regarding their findings. In addition, we excluded the studies by Satkunam et al 40 and by Tashiro et al 43 due to clinical heterogeneity in the exposure definition. Specifically, these researchers did not strictly examine the duration of the prescribed chemotherapy regimen; rather, they studied a composite exposure that included dose reductions and dose modifications, such as a periodic dose omission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptable toxicities and compliance were observed in the patients with stage III colon cancer when administered eight courses of capecitabine with a dose of 1250 mg/m 2 orally, twice daily, on days 1–14, every 21 days [15, 16]. Enlightened by the results of the IDEA trial, we hypothesized that a modified XELOX (mXELOX) adjuvant chemotherapy with 6 cycles of oxaliplatin and a full cycle of capecitabine might have comparable efficacy with acceptable toxicities compared with the 6-month standard XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with stage III colon cancer, particularly in the high-risk subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%