2010
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-3167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncolytic Adenovirus ICOVIR-7 in Patients with Advanced and Refractory Solid Tumors

Abstract: Purpose: Twenty-one patients with cancer were treated with a single round of oncolytic adenovirus ICOVIR-7. Experimental Design: ICOVIR-7 features an RGD-4C modification of the fiber HI-loop of serotype 5 adenovirus for enhanced entry into tumor cells. Tumor selectivity is mediated by an insulator, a modified E2F promoter, and a Rb-binding site deletion of E1A, whereas replication is optimized with E2F binding hairpins and a Kozak sequence. ICOVIR-7 doses ranged from 2 × 1010 to 1 × 1012 viral p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
99
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(73 reference statements)
5
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increases the antitumor potential and efficacy of nanocarriers, since they decrease the nutrients and oxygen delivery to the tumors, and release the low molecular anticancer drugs in the vicinity of the tumor vasculature [49,85]. This promising strategy is under preclinical development, with a few clinical examples in phase I [87][88][89]. An additional drawback, that contributes to the current clinical failure of active targeting nanocarriers, comprises the increased immunogenicity and plasma protein adsorption when targeting moieties are included in the nanocarriers, decreasing their bloodstream circulation time and their ability to passively target the tumors [85].…”
Section: Reprinted By Permission From Macmillan Publishers Ltd: [Natumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increases the antitumor potential and efficacy of nanocarriers, since they decrease the nutrients and oxygen delivery to the tumors, and release the low molecular anticancer drugs in the vicinity of the tumor vasculature [49,85]. This promising strategy is under preclinical development, with a few clinical examples in phase I [87][88][89]. An additional drawback, that contributes to the current clinical failure of active targeting nanocarriers, comprises the increased immunogenicity and plasma protein adsorption when targeting moieties are included in the nanocarriers, decreasing their bloodstream circulation time and their ability to passively target the tumors [85].…”
Section: Reprinted By Permission From Macmillan Publishers Ltd: [Natumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncolytic adenoviruses have shown safety in clinical trials and some efficacy has also been seen (1)(2)(3)(4). Importantly, it has been discovered that immunologic factors are critical with regard to efficacy of oncolytic viruses (5) and some investigators consider them a sophisticated form of immunotherapy (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Anticancer agents that have been applied via IT injection include chemotherapy agents (eg, vincristine), oncolytic viruses (eg, ONYX-015), immunomodulators (eg, agonistic CD40 monoclonal antibodies), and autologous immune cells (eg, dendritic cells). [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Potential advantages of IT delivery of anticancer drugs include better anticancer effectiveness through achievement of high concentrations of anticancer agents within the tumor microenvironment and reduced systemic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug resistance. 5,[10][11][12] In general, single-agent efficacy has been less than satisfying to date; however, promising results have been achieved using IT-administered targeted therapies, combined with conventional chemotherapy or radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%