2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oncovascular compartmental resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with vascular involvement

Abstract: Vascular resection and reconstruction are safe and feasible in case of RSTS. The morbidity rate was acceptable, and there were no perioperative deaths. Despite recurrence rates that remain high, oncovascular resection enhances resection margins and allows encouraging survival results for patients often considered as nonresectable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, an R2 resection was independently associated with inferior OS with a trend toward R1 resection and an increase in number of organs resected and inferior OS (Table ). A complete resection with negative margins has repeatedly been shown to be essential to maximize the chance for long term survival in RPS . As seen in our study, prior reports have also associated multivisceral resection with inferior survival for RPS .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, an R2 resection was independently associated with inferior OS with a trend toward R1 resection and an increase in number of organs resected and inferior OS (Table ). A complete resection with negative margins has repeatedly been shown to be essential to maximize the chance for long term survival in RPS . As seen in our study, prior reports have also associated multivisceral resection with inferior survival for RPS .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…[11][12][13][14] Similar findings have been reported in multiple small case series of multivisceral RPS resections performed at high volume institutions. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, due to the rarity of this disease, present existing series are often small in size, include extremity sarcomas in analyses, or investigate primary leiomyosarcoma of the IVC only.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor size, histologic subtype, malignancy grade, and multifocality were significant tumor‐related predictors of the outcome with patterns of recurrence depending on the histologic subtype . In another series of patients who received oncovascular surgery, microscopically confirmed vascular invasion did not increase the local recurrence, which is probably because of the margin enhancement obtained by the vessel resection …”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the odds ratios (ORs) of the comparison of the presence and absence of morbidity between absence and presence of vascular resection were well above 1, even after performing an adjustment for the number of organs resected . In another retrospective study of 126 patients who received oncovascular surgery, which included 31 patients with RPS, the reintervention rate was 16%, and an early thrombosis of the inferior vena cava prosthesis developed in one patient. However, there were no post‐operative deaths in this study.…”
Section: Morbiditymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tumor infiltration is a rare cause of aortic rupture. Besides the germ cell testicular cancer [ 16 ], abdominal aortic invasion has also been reported in other types of malignancies as soft tissue sarcomas [ 17 20 ], paragangliomas [ 21 ], lymphomas [ 22 ] and gynecological tumors [ 23 ]. Most authors consent that endovascular aortic intervention is an effective and safe method which should be encouraged to provide a definite therapeutic impact in a subset of patients who would otherwise not be candidates for curative surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%