Ondatra zibethicus

Willner, Gale R.; Feldhamer, George A.; Zucker, Elizabeth E.; Chapman, Joseph A.

doi:10.2307/3504016

Cited by 49 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2). This length corresponds, according to literature, to an optimal size of survey for muskrat, coypu and beaver territories along waterways (Robicheaux 1978in Jouventin et al 1996Willner et al 1980;Müller-Schwarze and Sun 2003). The minimum distance between two sites was 2 km, although most sites are generally separated by at least 5 km.…”

Section: Data Samplingmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Abiotic and vegetation data were measured once at each site, between April and August 2007, so fall and winter requirements were not studied here. Nine abiotic variables were measured (Willner et al 1980;Erôme 1982;Allen 1983;Allen and Hoffman 1984;Woods et al 1992;Corriale et al 2006). Water depth, bank height, bank slope, ground texture (silty, organic or sandy) and ground structure (agregate or compact) were measured every 100 m (from 0 to 500 m) on each bank, i.e.…”

Section: Data Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both species have been repeatedly introduced into multiple European countries (Willner et al 1980;Carter and Leonard 2002). These two aquatic rodents modify wetland ecosystems through grazing and facilitate the establishment of invasive plant species by creating open areas (Johnson and Foote 1997;Higgins and Mitsch 2001;Prigioni et al 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

River management and habitat characteristics of three sympatric aquatic rodents: common muskrat, coypu and European beaver

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceThe ecological environment of three aquatic rodents was studied in the French Ardennes region. Two species, the coypu () and the common muskrat (), are invasive. By contrast the native European beaver () was extirpated from the region, subsequently reintroduced, and currently is protected. The aim of this study was to compare the ecological requirements of these three species and predict their future range distributions. We studied the relationship between the species and describe the characteristics of waterways and riparian vegetation in 29 sampling sites. Coypus and muskrats were observed in a variety of riparian habitats and their probability of detection appeared to be independent of waterway width, bank height or bank slope. The availability of numerous herbaceous plants, known to be consumed by these species, may facilitate their settlement. Muskrats are widespread on the French Ardennes waterways, but coypus have not yet colonised the northern part of the region. On the other hand, the beaver was observed primarily in the widest waterways with high banks, where woody plant species, such as , and , are found in abundance. Potentially favourable sites for beaver and coypu settlement were analysed to suggest appropriate management according to each species' status. However, the number of sample sites is weak, especially for sites with beaver, limiting our conclusion

show abstract

Section: Data Samplingmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Data Samplingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

River management and habitat characteristics of three sympatric aquatic rodents: common muskrat, coypu and European beaver

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We do so with 17 mammals (Wilcox, 1950;McManus, 1974;Jenkins and Busher, 1979;Estes, 1980;Willner et al, 1980;Olsen, 1983;Conley and Porter, 1986;Pass and Freeth, 1993;Koprowski, 1994;Lariviere and Walton, 1998;Pasitschniak-Arts and Marinelli, 1998;Sidorovich et al, 1999;Mattern and McLennan, 2000;Scott et al, 2001;Fish et al, 2002;Valencak et al, 2003;Spotorno et al, 2004;Fedosenko and Blank, 2005;Mecklenburg et al, 2009;Dickerson et al, 2012) and 10 insects (Carlson and Chi, 1974 and data from a range of online SEM images). These measurements yield scalings given in Table 2.…”

Section: An Animal's Surface Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Cleanliness is next to godliness: mechanisms for staying clean

Amador

2015

Journal of Experimental Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Getting dirty is a fundamental problem, and one for which there are few solutions, especially across the enormous range of animal size. How do both a honeybee and a squirrel get clean? In this Review, we discuss two broad types of cleaning, considered from the viewpoint of energetics. Non-renewable cleaning strategies rely upon the organism as an energy source. Examples include grooming motions, wet-dog shaking or the secretion of chemicals. Renewable cleaning strategies depend on environmental sources of energy, such as the use of eyelashes to redirect incoming wind and so reduce deposition onto the eye. Both strategies take advantage of body hair to facilitate cleaning, and honeybees and squirrels, for example, each have around 3 million hairs. This hair mat increases the area on which particles can land by a factor of 100, but also suspends particles above the body, reducing their adhesion and facilitating removal. We hope that the strategies outlined here will inspire energy-efficient cleaning strategies in synthetic systems.

show abstract

“…;Barry 1977;Lackey et al 1985 Willner et al 1980;Campbell and MacArthur 1996;Erb and Perry, Jr. 2003], and White-tailed Deer [Odocoileus virginianus;Shaw 1963;Case and McCullough 1987;Pietz and Granfors 2000]). However, such observations are lacking for Beavers (Castor canadensis).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beavers, <em>Castor canadensis</em>, Feeding on Salmon Carcasses: Opportunistic Use of a Seasonally Superabundant Food Source

Gleason

Hoffman²,

Wendland

2005

Can Field Nat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report observations of Beavers (Castor canadensis) foraging and feeding on discarded Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) carcasses within the confines of the Susitna River drainage in southcentral Alaska on three separate occasions between 1999 and 2004. In all three instances, Beavers were observed actively seeking out freshly discarded carcasses or transporting “fresh” salmon carcasses in their mouths. In one instance, Beavers were seen using their dextrous forefeet to “handle” chunks of salmon while hunched over carcasses and in this case we actually witnessed Beavers “chewing” and ingestion was assumed. In the other two instances, Beavers were observed swimming with salmon carcasses in their mouths. Though unique within the framework of Beaver foraging ecology, we suggest this behavior may be a fairly common strategy employed by Beavers in Alaskan streams and rivers to take advantage of a seasonally superabundant source of protein.

show abstract

Ondatra zibethicus

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

River management and habitat characteristics of three sympatric aquatic rodents: common muskrat, coypu and European beaver

River management and habitat characteristics of three sympatric aquatic rodents: common muskrat, coypu and European beaver

Cleanliness is next to godliness: mechanisms for staying clean

Beavers, <em>Castor canadensis</em>, Feeding on Salmon Carcasses: Opportunistic Use of a Seasonally Superabundant Food Source

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About