2019
DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07844-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One anastomosis gastric bypass: key technical features, and prevention and management of procedure-specific complications

Abstract: Introduction: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is now a recognised mainstream bariatric procedure being adopted by an increasing number of surgeons. The purpose of this review was to present an evidence-based summary of its key technical aspects and prevention and management of its specific complications. Evidence Acquisition:We examined PubMed for all published articles on OAGB, including the ones published under one of its various other names.Evidence Synthesis: An ideal OAGB procedure has a long, narro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is recognized that there is a growing interest in OAGB/MGB and SADIs and that, as yet, these are not covered robustly by clinical practice guidelines. Until such data emerge, it may be hypothesized that requirements for nutritional supplements in people undergoing OAGB/MGB with BP limb of 150 cm would be at least that of people undergoing RYGB, if not more, and that nutritional requirements for people undergoing OAGB/MGB with BP limb greater than 150 cm and SADIS would be at least that of people undergoing the traditional BPD/DS 163–166 . We therefore recommend that healthcare professionals follow RYGB nutritional recommendations for postoperative care after OAGB/MGB with BP limb length of 150 cm and BPD/DS recommendations for people after OAGB/MGB with BP limb length of greater than 150 cm or SADIs.…”
Section: Abnormal Test Results and Clinical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recognized that there is a growing interest in OAGB/MGB and SADIs and that, as yet, these are not covered robustly by clinical practice guidelines. Until such data emerge, it may be hypothesized that requirements for nutritional supplements in people undergoing OAGB/MGB with BP limb of 150 cm would be at least that of people undergoing RYGB, if not more, and that nutritional requirements for people undergoing OAGB/MGB with BP limb greater than 150 cm and SADIS would be at least that of people undergoing the traditional BPD/DS 163–166 . We therefore recommend that healthcare professionals follow RYGB nutritional recommendations for postoperative care after OAGB/MGB with BP limb length of 150 cm and BPD/DS recommendations for people after OAGB/MGB with BP limb length of greater than 150 cm or SADIs.…”
Section: Abnormal Test Results and Clinical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors measure the whole length of the small intestine, and afferent limb longitude is determined depending on BMI and comorbidities [ 39 , 55 ]. OAGB is performed by a short 150–200-cm biliopancreatic limb [ 36 , 37 , 41 , 55 ], similarly to SADJ [ 27 ]. Others suggest taking the common limb at least 300-cm distant from the ileocecal valve to avoid hypoproteinaemia and anaemia [ 28 , 30 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, surgical complications, intestinal incarceration in Petersen space and lack of vitamins should not be neglected. [13,14]…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%