2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10061-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Bioethics for Covid 19?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Gardiner (2022a, p. 571) emphasizes, "conventional bioethics has largely failed to engage, and so is left mainly to contribute to damage limitation, emergency management, and redress." A way to overcome this limitation and avoid falling into the vices of a super cial and overly technical bioethics that only limits itself to acting when it is too late, but is incapable of providing normative, descriptive knowledge and practical wisdom to guide decision-making and anticipate risks, is to move toward what some authors have called "One Bioethics" (Thompson & List, 2015;Thompson, 2015Thompson, , 2020Capps, 2022). Ecological bioethics and One Bioethics could offer valuable normative and epistemic resources to prudently address the risks derived from the emergence and spread of EIDs and zoonoses in the Anthropocene Age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Gardiner (2022a, p. 571) emphasizes, "conventional bioethics has largely failed to engage, and so is left mainly to contribute to damage limitation, emergency management, and redress." A way to overcome this limitation and avoid falling into the vices of a super cial and overly technical bioethics that only limits itself to acting when it is too late, but is incapable of providing normative, descriptive knowledge and practical wisdom to guide decision-making and anticipate risks, is to move toward what some authors have called "One Bioethics" (Thompson & List, 2015;Thompson, 2015Thompson, , 2020Capps, 2022). Ecological bioethics and One Bioethics could offer valuable normative and epistemic resources to prudently address the risks derived from the emergence and spread of EIDs and zoonoses in the Anthropocene Age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%