2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-013-9395-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-class support vector machines: analysis of outlier detection for wireless sensor networks in harsh environments

Abstract: Machine learning, like its various applications, has received a great interest in outlier detection in Wireless Sensor Networks. Support Vector Machines (SVM) are a special type of Machine learning techniques which are computationally inexpensive and provide a sparse solution. This work presents a detailed analysis of various formulations of one-class SVMs, like, hyper-plane, hyper-sphere, quarter-sphere and hyper-ellipsoidal. These formulations are used to separate the normal data from anomalous data. Various… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shahid et al [87]: in this work, various formulations of One-Class SVM such as hyper-plane, hyper-sphere, quarter-sphere and hyper-ellipsoidal were analyzed. A number of anomaly detection models for WSN that were designed based on these formulations were analyzed with regards to some characteristics, including the type of input data, the exploitation of spatial, temporal and feature correlations, the setup of SVM thresholds, outlier types, the determination of anomaly type, outlier degree, the effects of dynamic topology change, the dynamic data distribution, and the network heterogeneity.…”
Section: Detection Method-based Classification Of Anomaly Detection Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahid et al [87]: in this work, various formulations of One-Class SVM such as hyper-plane, hyper-sphere, quarter-sphere and hyper-ellipsoidal were analyzed. A number of anomaly detection models for WSN that were designed based on these formulations were analyzed with regards to some characteristics, including the type of input data, the exploitation of spatial, temporal and feature correlations, the setup of SVM thresholds, outlier types, the determination of anomaly type, outlier degree, the effects of dynamic topology change, the dynamic data distribution, and the network heterogeneity.…”
Section: Detection Method-based Classification Of Anomaly Detection Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a local detection algorithm, which means that the degree depends on the isolation of the object relative to its neighborhood. (4) Support Vector Machine (SVM) based method [28,29]. In this method, the support vector regression is used to establish the regression model of the historical time series.…”
Section: Outlier Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a new sample, it will then be classified as Trojan-free or Trojan-infested depending on which side of the boundary it lies in. [15] proposes different decision boundaries like hyperplane, hypersphere, and hyperellipsoid. In our Trojan detection context, we will use hyperplane because it has a shorter run time and its performance is comparable to the other decision boundaries according to our experimental results.…”
Section: B Svm Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%