2018 Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-dimensional modeling methodology for shock tubes: Application to the EAST facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second successfully simulated the test slug, but because the driver was not fully modelled the shock deceleration trajectory was not reproduced (Chandel et al 2019). One-dimensional simulation approaches have also been inconclusive (Sharma Priyadarshini et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second successfully simulated the test slug, but because the driver was not fully modelled the shock deceleration trajectory was not reproduced (Chandel et al 2019). One-dimensional simulation approaches have also been inconclusive (Sharma Priyadarshini et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this problem can also arise with other states such as N 2 (C), especially in the early phase of a discharge [9,10] or when argon is present [4,11]. Examples also exist in high enthalpy flows where thermal equilibrium (electron temperature equal to gas temperature) persists [12][13][14]. In previous work [15,16], the authors measured the rotational temperatures of the N 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar method may be performed to characterize the stagnation-line flow on a large blunt body as an analogy to the post-shock flow, which is a method currently employed by the group at NASA Ames [13]. Many researchers have performed full facility simulations of the shock tube to try to incorporate the more complex effects of driver and boundary layer growth, the simplest being one-dimensional models, such as L1d by Jacobs et al [14,15] and Sharma et al [16], which have simplified models of the boundary layer growth that alter the shock speed and gas slice locations. Simulation complexity may be expanded up to fully two-dimensional simulations of the entire facility, incorporating numerical models of the transient driver and diaphragm opening, which account for the larger proportion of shock speed variation effects [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%