2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp02209k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-electron bonds are not “half-bonds”

Abstract: The formation of one-electron bonds follows the same mechanism as the regular covalent bonds. It is the same phenomenon, quantum interference, that rules the stabilization of systems containing such bonds and there is no distinction between one- and two-electron bonds from the conceptual point of view. The difference in the BDEs of the one- and two electron bonds has no relation with bond order. One-electron bonds are not “half-bonds”.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, classify the NaÀB bond in NaBH 3 À as a one-electron bond. [21] Figure S1 provides additional evidence that justifies our assumption that B À H ELF basins overlap de extreme lobe of the boron porbital. For radical CBH 3 À at NaBH 3 À equilibrium structure, ELF identifies the three BÀH basins and two monosynaptic basins on the main axis, one above and one below the BH 3 moiety.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…These results, classify the NaÀB bond in NaBH 3 À as a one-electron bond. [21] Figure S1 provides additional evidence that justifies our assumption that B À H ELF basins overlap de extreme lobe of the boron porbital. For radical CBH 3 À at NaBH 3 À equilibrium structure, ELF identifies the three BÀH basins and two monosynaptic basins on the main axis, one above and one below the BH 3 moiety.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The PBI for each of the three pairs is equal to 0.5, indicating that each corresponds to exactly half of a covalent bond. The analysis results indicate that there is one ordinary σ‐bond and a one‐electron π‐bond between the two BH 2 moieties, consistent with previous reports and also the spin density plot showing clear π‐bonding feature.…”
Section: Advanced Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three great advantages of using this type of wave function to perform the interference energy analysis: (a) the atomic orbitals are uniquely defined within a given basis set (avoiding the arbitrariness involved in the choice of atomic orbitals); (b) the total interference energy and density per bond are automatically obtained; (c) contrary to Slater-type wave functions, GVB (and SCVB) wave functions are basis for the symmetric (or permutation) group as required by the permutation symmetry of the many-electrons Hamiltonian. The method has been applied to various classes of chemical species [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], diatomic and polyatomic molecules, with single, double and triple bonds, with different degrees of polarity, linear or branched, cyclic or not, conjugated and aromatics confirming that chemical bonds are formed due to the kinetic energy decrease caused by the quantum interference phenomenon taking place among the atomic orbitals involved in the bond, as predicted several decades ago by Ruedenberg [32]. The details of the method will not be presented but the interested reader may consult the appropriate literature [50,51].…”
Section: The Nature Of the Chemical Bond Quantum Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed discussion of the (2c-1e) bonds can be found in Refs. [52,53] Molecules 2021, 26, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 14 to the depth of the potential wells comes from the interference term, as in any other bond.…”
Section: The Nature Of the Chemical Bond Quantum Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation