2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41981-020-00133-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-flow synthesis of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol using homo- and heterogeneous Lewis acids

Abstract: Continuous flow chemistry holds great potential for the production of biologically relevant molecules. Herein, we present an approach for the continuous synthesis of cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol in a one-flow system. The designed route consists of a reaction cascade involving Friedel-Crafts alkylation, subsequent ring opening and cyclisation in up to 45% yield. The reactions were successfully performed using both hetero- and homogeneous Lewis acids in continuous flow and provide yields that are similar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We began our investigation by screening numerous Lewis and Brønsted acids to initiate allylic cation chemistry by mimicking the effects of BF 3 ·OEt 2 as reported in the literature. Previously, Mascal and co-workers obtained normal CBD 3 in 71% yield by para -toluenesulfonic acid ( p -TsOH) acid-catalyzed addition to α-phellandrene 9 (Scheme B). , In an effort to match this efficiency, we considered the well-established Friedel–Crafts alkylation/cationic pathway using olivetol 7 and allylic alcohol 10 to access H 2 CBD isomers 3 and 6 (Scheme C,D). Our catalyst scope included various Lewis acids including Sc­(III)-, La­(III)-, Eu­(III)-, and Yb­(III)-triflates, p -TsOH, and methanesulfonic acid (MsOH), as well as combinations of both Lewis and Brønsted acids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We began our investigation by screening numerous Lewis and Brønsted acids to initiate allylic cation chemistry by mimicking the effects of BF 3 ·OEt 2 as reported in the literature. Previously, Mascal and co-workers obtained normal CBD 3 in 71% yield by para -toluenesulfonic acid ( p -TsOH) acid-catalyzed addition to α-phellandrene 9 (Scheme B). , In an effort to match this efficiency, we considered the well-established Friedel–Crafts alkylation/cationic pathway using olivetol 7 and allylic alcohol 10 to access H 2 CBD isomers 3 and 6 (Scheme C,D). Our catalyst scope included various Lewis acids including Sc­(III)-, La­(III)-, Eu­(III)-, and Yb­(III)-triflates, p -TsOH, and methanesulfonic acid (MsOH), as well as combinations of both Lewis and Brønsted acids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmaceutical companies thereby opt to target individual steps for flow development, which may be of particular relevance towards the end of the synthesis where the material becomes more valuable, while the reactor containment will mitigate any concerns relating to the cytotoxicity of the final API at the same time. The relevance of natural products towards anticancer drugs has been highlighted in this review, and it is expected that flow technology will continue to facilitate their generation as exemplified in additional studies based on taxol [107], cannabinoids [108], as well as peptide-based systems [109] As this short review has shown, an increase in reported case studies is evident within the last few years demonstrating that flow processing has not only matured as an enabling technology but moreover is accepted and endorsed by both scientists and management within the pharmaceutical industry. A further increase in activity can be expected in this area to realize further autonomy of API production in response to delays and shortages recognized for many drugs during the current pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are usually not environmentally friendly and can produce undesired side products. Flow chemistry has shown to be useful to produce cannabinoids, albeit at small scales. Flow chemistry is beneficial by closing the gap between small-scale bench chemists and large-scale process engineers by mimicking large-scale production in a laboratory environment through continuous production with a limited need to interact with the system. As shown in Figure , the simple flow design provides the ability to tailor the flow path and add additional sites that lead to the final product (i.e., purification, hydrogenation, sample taking, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%