2003
DOI: 10.1002/sce.10057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One foot on the dock and one foot on the boat: Differences among preservice science teachers' interpretations of field‐based science methods in culturally diverse contexts

Abstract: ABSTRACT:To support lasting change in science classrooms, efforts must be made to assist teachers in understanding the outcomes of their pedagogical choices. The process of reflection is not limited to experienced teachers' experiences, though we must recognize that preservice teachers do not draw upon the same vast repertoire and knowledge. The purpose of this study was to investigate preservice science teachers' beliefs about science teaching and learning through reflections on their own teaching with lower … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What seems clear is that student teachers who are most successful in their interactions, and who often obtained highest levels of argumentation from their learners, were those who stepped beyond the functional elements they were taught in the university course. This fits with Yerrick and Hoving's idea that student teachers, as novice practitioners, can be seen as those who 'reproduce' what has been set out to them at university and those who 'produce' more than this, going further when they practice teaching (Yerrick and Hoving, 2003). Thus Thea, Maria, Shane and Vuyani could be seen as 'producers' and Vusi, Alan, Stanley, Bulelwa and Carmen as 'reproducers'.…”
Section: Relative Influences Of the University-based Course On Argumesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…What seems clear is that student teachers who are most successful in their interactions, and who often obtained highest levels of argumentation from their learners, were those who stepped beyond the functional elements they were taught in the university course. This fits with Yerrick and Hoving's idea that student teachers, as novice practitioners, can be seen as those who 'reproduce' what has been set out to them at university and those who 'produce' more than this, going further when they practice teaching (Yerrick and Hoving, 2003). Thus Thea, Maria, Shane and Vuyani could be seen as 'producers' and Vusi, Alan, Stanley, Bulelwa and Carmen as 'reproducers'.…”
Section: Relative Influences Of the University-based Course On Argumesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Then Miguel was subsequently given an audio-recorded stimulated recall interview, in which he analyzed, together with the investigator, his own behavior in the classroom. The stimulated recall interview has been used in other work to study the beliefs of science teachers (Yerrick & Hoving, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulated recall interview has been used in other work to study the beliefs of science teachers (Yerrick & Hoving, 2003). Our aim in the present study was to reconstruct the trajectory of Consuelo's career with the help of the 1993 and 2002 maps.…”
Section: The Stimulated Recall Interviewmentioning
confidence: 99%