2012
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2011.644347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Benedini, who conducted a study in the Brazilian context, identified that "younger adults" with lower income and education were more interested in using bicycles for transportation [22] Therefore the socio-cultural attitude toward cycling can be considered as a contextspecific factor. Travel speed, safety, and distance are base-level factors that influence travel choice where cyclists are less likely to take bicycle trips for longer distances [23], [24], [25]As opposed to this view, a 2006 Minneapolis study shows that 83% of the time, cyclists will choose a longer route if provided with bike routes and were willing to add 20 minutes onto their trip for cycling. Therefore, depending on the context, the journey purpose and distances could act as motivators or barriers to cycling use [26].…”
Section: Determinants Of Willingness To Bikementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benedini, who conducted a study in the Brazilian context, identified that "younger adults" with lower income and education were more interested in using bicycles for transportation [22] Therefore the socio-cultural attitude toward cycling can be considered as a contextspecific factor. Travel speed, safety, and distance are base-level factors that influence travel choice where cyclists are less likely to take bicycle trips for longer distances [23], [24], [25]As opposed to this view, a 2006 Minneapolis study shows that 83% of the time, cyclists will choose a longer route if provided with bike routes and were willing to add 20 minutes onto their trip for cycling. Therefore, depending on the context, the journey purpose and distances could act as motivators or barriers to cycling use [26].…”
Section: Determinants Of Willingness To Bikementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban cycling as a statistically underperformed practice has been framed as a form of niche resistance to dominant forms of urban mobility (Horton, 2006;Horton et al, 2007;Spinney, 2009Spinney, , 2010Watson, 2012Watson, , 2013. While abundant literature agrees that urban spaces are dominated by automobility (Featherstone et al, 2005;Furness, 2007Furness, , 2010Sheller and Urry, 2000;Urry, 2000Urry, , 2004Urry, , 2007, few studies juxtapose urban cycling and car driving by explicitly analysing the taken-for-granted marginalized position of the former (Fincham, 2006;Latham and Wood, 2015). These studies show that resources are unevenly allocated among transportation practices but have not further conceptualized the allocation mechanism.…”
Section: Urban Cycling As Political Entitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gamification has a considerable impact on food couriers also because cycling is often not seen as 'serious' mobility (Aldred, 2015;Bennett, 2019;Furness, 2010). Since their inception, food delivery platforms have initially taken advantage of the bicycle and its versatile role for both work and play (Popan & Anaya-Boig, 2022).…”
Section: Games Against Gamificationmentioning
confidence: 99%