2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00459.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One month after diagnosis: quality of life, coping and previous functioning in siblings of children with cancer1

Abstract: During the first 2 months after the diagnosis of cancer in a brother or sister, siblings have relatively lower QoL than peers. Health problems that existed before diagnosis may be a predictor of later adjustment problems. Positive expectations about the course of the illness appear to protect siblings from distress. Information about the illness is a delicate issue that requires parental guidance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
75
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronic illnesses reported in this study were mostly cystic fibrosis, congenital heart disease and cancer; therefore, it may be an important future research area for siblings of children with asthma. In a study that assessed quality of life in siblings of children with cancer demonstrated that, motor and cognitive skills as well as negative and positive emotions domains of QoL were impaired partially showing concordance with our results 16 . The difference between the physical QoL results may be attributed to the use of different QoL scales since they used TNO-AZL children's QoL questionnaire and also to the difference in nature of cancer and asthma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chronic illnesses reported in this study were mostly cystic fibrosis, congenital heart disease and cancer; therefore, it may be an important future research area for siblings of children with asthma. In a study that assessed quality of life in siblings of children with cancer demonstrated that, motor and cognitive skills as well as negative and positive emotions domains of QoL were impaired partially showing concordance with our results 16 . The difference between the physical QoL results may be attributed to the use of different QoL scales since they used TNO-AZL children's QoL questionnaire and also to the difference in nature of cancer and asthma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Chronic diseases in children impact not only the patients themselves but also their families including parents and siblings [4][5][6]8,[16][17][18][19] . Despite the fact that both chronic disease in the child and impaired QoL and psychosocial status of parent influences QoL in the sibling negatively, this area is not studied as extensively in asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Suppressing emotions and feelings is a common negative conclusion. 18,19 There have also been findings of a positive effect (eg, sibling bonding) on siblings residing in a household with a child with disability, 20,21 whereas other studies have concluded no impact. [22][23][24] Vermaes et al 25 recently published a metaanalysis studying the psychological functioning of siblings in families with children with chronic conditions and concluded that there is an overall negative effect with no findings to support a hypothesis that some siblings are more resilient and have more positive self-attributes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A consensus has been reached that siblings of chronically ill children are at a greater risk for poor mental health outcomes than those without; however, the research has yet to determine what specific familial and individual characteristics help in predicting these mental health outcomes. Drawing upon two broad concepts in sociology, the theory of social roles and the idea of social support, and using the stress process as a theoretical model, I hope to clarify previous contradictions about which type of siblings fare better mentally (Kaminsky and Dewey 2002;Labay and Walco 2004;Houtzager et al 2005;Hamama et al 2008). Doing so will allow healthcare professionals to tailor interventions specifically to siblings who exhibit the identified high-risk characteristics for poor mental health outcomes, therein promoting better results for the siblings and the families as a whole.…”
Section: Research Beginnings and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%