2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One of the key characteristics of ancient DNA, low copy number, may be a product of its extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because inhibition and other sources of sporadic inefficiency (e.g., pipetting errors or saturation of reactions with excessive amounts of DNA) are sample-dependent, we recommend the spike-in strategy as a general means of quality control in library preparation. When applying a similar control strategy to silica-based DNA extraction, we found that recovery rates are much less variable compared to library preparation; in fact, at between 80 and 90%, they are consistently higher than reported in a previous study (Barta et al 2014). Unlike in library preparation, we therefore consider spike-in controls unnecessary in DNA extraction.…”
Section: Genome Research 1233mentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Because inhibition and other sources of sporadic inefficiency (e.g., pipetting errors or saturation of reactions with excessive amounts of DNA) are sample-dependent, we recommend the spike-in strategy as a general means of quality control in library preparation. When applying a similar control strategy to silica-based DNA extraction, we found that recovery rates are much less variable compared to library preparation; in fact, at between 80 and 90%, they are consistently higher than reported in a previous study (Barta et al 2014). Unlike in library preparation, we therefore consider spike-in controls unnecessary in DNA extraction.…”
Section: Genome Research 1233mentioning
confidence: 43%
“…; Barta et al . ). If specifically short DNA fragments had been lost in the DNA extractions using modified protocols, this would explain both the lower yield and higher quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…), specifically regarding the analysis of nuclear DNA (Barta et al . ). Different methods provide highly variable yields of DNA, in particular for short (under 200 bp) DNA segments (Dabney et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DNA extraction methods, including commercial kits, may leave behind some residual inhibitors and often result in loss of sample DNA (Shipley et al 2012;Monroe et al 2013;Barta et al 2014;Kemp et al 2014), which increases the chance of sample cross-contamination (Frickhofen and Young 1991;Queipo-Ortuño et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%