One-parent-one-language (OPOL) families: is the majority language-speaking parent instrumental in the minority language development?

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the strategies majority language-speaking parents use to support the development of the minority language in families who follow the pattern of exposure known as one-parent-one-language (OPOL). In this particular pattern of raising a child bilingually, each parent speaks only their own native language to their children. Previous studies concerned with language development in children raised under the OPOL pattern primarily focused on how input from the minority language-speaking parent affects minority language development, leaving the role of the majority language-speaking parent largely unexplored. To address this gap, a case study was carried out on three families in Brisbane, Australia, who reported following the OPOL pattern. Video and audio recordings were taken, along with interviews using an elicited recall task based on the recordings to gather data on the families' language practices and motivations. The results of the qualitative analysis suggest that, in these families, the majority language-speaking parent plays an important role that extends beyond the provision of input in the majority language and may contribute to fostering minority language development and maintenance.

Whose heritage? What inheritance?: conceptualising family language identities

“…This is reminiscent of Norton's (2013) notion of investmentalthough in this case, it is a lack of investment for the heritage language, in favour of a language spoken by just one parent, but promising greater 'capital' (Bourdieu 1986). This is a pragmatic attitude in an area where emotion often reigns, inhibiting the affective engagement with identity development (Venables et al 2014).…”

The Effect of Multicultural Family Structures on the Language Attitudes of Children and Adolescents

“…Childhood bilingualism literature provided sufficient theoretical basis for the current study. One avenue of past research on childhood bilingualism partially focused on crosscultural marriage where there was a dominant language-speaking parent and a minority language-speaking parent with their offspring becoming bilingual (Qiu & Winsler, 2017;Takeuchi, 2006;Venables et al, 2014). In some cases, both parents were minority language speakers from the same language background, but not in a cross-cultural marriage (For example, a Filipino couple lived in Bangkok).…”

From family language practices to family language policies : Children as socializing agents

“…Simultaneously, they point to some interactionally emerging dilemmas that are related to parental aims to promote children's bilingualism (e.g., Döpke, 1992;Lanza, 1997Lanza, /2004Venables et al, 2014). Parents' attempts to promote their language in everyday family interactions by using lexical modeling, requests for translation (Döpke, 1992), or in other ways directing and constraining children's language choice may hinder the conversational flow and interrupt the interaction, thereby affecting the social ambience of the family encounter.…”