“…It is found that the sensitivity of our sensor is better than those of NiO-TiO 2 /GCE 13 , three-dimensional dendritic Pt nanostructures/GCE 16 , Cu/G 21 , nafion/CuNPs-nitrogen doped GP/GCE 52 , CuNPs-GP nanoflowers/GCE 53 , and rGO-Ni(OH) 2 /GCE 54 . Also, it provides a good dynamic range, which is wider than those of some sensing electrodes from previous reports, including Cu/G 21 , CuNPs-MWCNTs/GCE 55 , Ni(OH) 2 /rGO/MWCNT/GCE 56 , Cu 2 O/PtE 57 , rGO-Ni(OH) 2 /GCE 54 , CuNPs-GP/GCE 58 , and DMG-CuNPs/GCE 14 . Although Cu(II)-C 3 N 4 /MWCNTs/GCE 11 , Ni(OH) 2 /rGO/MWCNT/ GCE 56 , Cu 2 O/PtE 57 , CuNPs/GP/GCE 58 , and CuNPs-MWCNTs/GCE 55 reveal very high sensitivity, some use higher operating potentials and also complex fabrication processes.…”